MBWorld.org Forums - View Single Post

Thericker · 06-26-2009, 06:45 PM

Well if Perf? is in your list of reasons to by either SL63/CL63 know this, the added weight in CL63 is def noticable, CL63 from a dig or roll-on is an absolute turd. Not trying to rip on it just stating fact, (I personally love the exterior/interior improvements of the new CL 216, it's just the 63 motor is woefully inadequate for the curb weight, actually same problem w/SL63, just NOT as pronounced. The added exhaust/note/burbles are cool, but only help mask the lack luster acceleration)

Either get the CL600/CL65 SL600/SL55/SL65

06-26-2009, 06:45 PM	#18
Thericker MBWorld Fanatic! Join Date: Feb 2004 Location: Southern, CA. Posts: 5,901 Drives: W220 S430 w/Supercharger C6 Corvette blk on blk 2005 SL600 Twin Turbo AMG body blk on blk loaded!	Well if Perf? is in your list of reasons to by either SL63/CL63 know this, the added weight in CL63 is def noticable, CL63 from a dig or roll-on is an absolute turd. Not trying to rip on it just stating fact, (I personally love the exterior/interior improvements of the new CL 216, it's just the 63 motor is woefully inadequate for the curb weight, actually same problem w/SL63, just NOT as pronounced. The added exhaust/note/burbles are cool, but only help mask the lack luster acceleration) Either get the CL600/CL65 SL600/SL55/SL65 __________________ '05 SL600 BITURBO 19x10.5 19x8.5 whls/Custom 3" DP's w/Hi-Flo cats/AMG quad tip cat-back 3" straight pipes/Custom CAI/Rear IC Reservoir 5.5 gall alum tank w/CM30-Pump/Powerchip TT Dyno-Tune Last edited by Thericker; 06-26-2009 at 06:56 PM.