Quote:
Originally Posted by 98aggie
I'm tired of read all the BS about MD/DD/DJ numbers. They are a tuning tool only.
Yes you can make a mustang read like a dyno jet. I have spent alot of time calibrating my MD to read like a dyno jet- since everyone is hooked on seeing the big number not just what their gains are. I had a couple cars on the dyno that had their car dynoed on a dyno jet and when we did the baseline pulls their rwhp and tq numbers were with in 1rwhp/tq.
Also all the dyno trick that dyno jets operators do to inflate their numbers don't work on mine. Just for trial we tried tire pressure, how it is straped down, where on the rollers it sits to see it affects power - mine doesn't change. Also the Weather correction factor is checked on every run and power seen on cold days and hot days stays the same.
|
I'm not trying to argue w/you, you seem like a gracious host & actually admitted to Blazeone you set your MD to read higher like DJ's, my quams are w/actual tuner not HIGHLIGHTING this.
Also the RWHP readings on blazeones SL600 w/20" whls is off by a good 40-65 RWHP too much, the RWTQ reading is off by 110+ these SL600/CL600 etc read @ most 550-560 RWTQ on 18"-19" whls on HIGHEST SET DJ's your MD showed Blazeones Stk SL600 w/20"s @ 669 RWTQ sorry not in this universe
He posted in his seperate thread you dyno'd another stock CL600 w/near identical #'s 600 V12 TT's make 110 rwtq less average on ANY DJ, this def explains the 842-845 RWTQ seen on the (2) otherwise stock S65's w/ONLY LET ECU...
You realize other equally modded ECU only SL/S65's from RENNtech/Kleemann average 700-720 RWTQ on DynoJets w/100-105 octane are you going to tell me LET has magically found an additional 100-145 RWTQ from ECU only??