OE-tuning dyno #s
11-11-2010, 05:30 PM
#1
MBWorld Fanatic!
Thread Starter
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Desert
Posts: 3,443
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
02 CLK 55 AMG,09 C63 loaded with P30
OE-tuning dyno #s
Ok I just have the OE-tuning. Everything is stock-no airbox mod,stock filters,charcoals intact. The 432 max hp was done with a long cool down. But still operating temps.
Trending Topics
11-11-2010, 07:15 PM
#8
Member
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 243
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
2009 C63 AMG
Hmm... I read a ton of posts with Dyno results for different ECU tunes, but the engine heat issue was brought up only in those with the OE tune. Is it just a coincidence or the OE tune does heat up the engine?
11-11-2010, 07:19 PM
#9
MBWorld Fanatic!
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: North Jersey
Posts: 2,207
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes
on
2 Posts
2012 CTS-V
Why?
I've been running without charcoals for almost 5,000 miles.
The only problem I've ever had was a stuck purge valve
and the MB tech. said it was not related in any way.
Actually, the car is running really strong.
I've been running without charcoals for almost 5,000 miles.
The only problem I've ever had was a stuck purge valve
and the MB tech. said it was not related in any way.
Actually, the car is running really strong.
11-11-2010, 07:37 PM
#12
MBWorld Fanatic!
11-11-2010, 07:47 PM
#14
MBWorld Fanatic!
No charcoals for me for 2K miles. No CEL. Also putting down much more torque than you and more HP.
Now Dyno it with the charcoals removed and K&N's and the air box mod done if you wanted to prove a point. Without that other test you proved nothing.
Also a weak chart. Show me the chart showing the correction. What correction is that showing? The 2010 is putting down more HP and torque though. This proves it.
Nice numbers though.
11-11-2010, 07:57 PM
#16
MBWorld Fanatic!
Thread Starter
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Desert
Posts: 3,443
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
02 CLK 55 AMG,09 C63 loaded with P30
No charcoals for me for 2K miles. No CEL. Also putting down much more torque than you and more HP.
Now Dyno it with the charcoals removed and K&N's and the air box mod done if you wanted to prove a point. Without that other test you proved nothing.
Also a weak chart. Show me the chart showing the correction. What correction is that showing? The 2010 is putting down more HP and torque though. This proves it.
Nice numbers though.
Now Dyno it with the charcoals removed and K&N's and the air box mod done if you wanted to prove a point. Without that other test you proved nothing.
Also a weak chart. Show me the chart showing the correction. What correction is that showing? The 2010 is putting down more HP and torque though. This proves it.
Nice numbers though.
11-11-2010, 08:01 PM
#17
MBWorld Fanatic!
Thread Starter
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Desert
Posts: 3,443
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
02 CLK 55 AMG,09 C63 loaded with P30
Also my friends E63 with same tuning got similar #s. But he has airbox mod,K&N filters,charcoals delete. Same shop and temps.
11-11-2010, 08:01 PM
#18
MBWorld Fanatic!
We should touch the charcoals because theres no point in them being there. if the ROW doesn't need them, we shouldn't either
btw ice packs in between runs is as natural as nitrous
btw ice packs in between runs is as natural as nitrous
Last edited by GHAZAN; 11-11-2010 at 08:04 PM.
11-11-2010, 08:02 PM
#19
MBWorld Fanatic!
Cooled between runs with ice. First run was after 25 mile drive in 70 degree weather 100% humidity with very little cool down in the wrong gear. 5th and final run was full cooldown (using ice) in 5th gear putting down 447whp and 408 torque SAE corrected. Only 900 miles also.
What correction are you showing us? How about a better chart.
Your torque curve looks nice, but your HP curve is spikey.. sup with that? What gear were you in?
11-11-2010, 08:10 PM
#20
MBWorld Fanatic!
Thread Starter
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Desert
Posts: 3,443
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
02 CLK 55 AMG,09 C63 loaded with P30
Cooled between runs with ice. First run was after 25 mile drive in 70 degree weather 100% humidity with very little cool down in the wrong gear. 5th and final run was full cooldown (using ice) in 5th gear putting down 447whp and 408 torque SAE corrected. Only 900 miles also.
What correction are you showing us? How about a better chart.
Your torque curve looks nice, but your HP curve is spikey.. sup with that? What gear were you in?
What correction are you showing us? How about a better chart.
Your torque curve looks nice, but your HP curve is spikey.. sup with that? What gear were you in?
11-11-2010, 08:15 PM
#22
MBWorld Fanatic!
https://mbworld.org/forums/4254088-post19.html
Again..... What correction are you showing us? Put up a better chart since I know you are trying to prove a point.
I thought MIR was the 22nd... If its ATCO I think I might be able to make it.
Just gotta drop 100 lb's before then for a fair race. 
Nice numbers though. Go OE!
11-11-2010, 08:16 PM
#23
MBWorld Fanatic!
11-11-2010, 08:22 PM
#24
MBWorld Fanatic!
Thread Starter
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Desert
Posts: 3,443
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
02 CLK 55 AMG,09 C63 loaded with P30
Seem high?
https://mbworld.org/forums/4254088-post19.html
Again..... What correction are you showing us? Put up a better chart since I know you are trying to prove a point.
I thought MIR was the 22nd... If its ATCO I think I might be able to make it. Just gotta drop 100 lb's before then for a fair race.
Nice numbers though. Go OE!
https://mbworld.org/forums/4254088-post19.html
Again..... What correction are you showing us? Put up a better chart since I know you are trying to prove a point.
I thought MIR was the 22nd... If its ATCO I think I might be able to make it.
Just gotta drop 100 lb's before then for a fair race. Nice numbers though. Go OE!
BTW Atco is this month on the 22nd.
11-11-2010, 08:24 PM
#25
MBWorld Fanatic!
Very common at the track to use ice between runs to cool down a car doing runs in quick succession..
