2006 C230 SS vs. 2005 C230 SS

k_lundquist · 07-21-2005, 03:02 PM

I went onto MBUSA this morning and saw the new stats for the 06 C230 Sport Sedan. I was somewhat disappointed that I just bought a 05 since the 06 now are a V6 (201hp) with 12 more HP than the I4 (189hp) 05. However, after comparing the cars in more detail I am actually happier with my 2005 purchase. Here's why, and a comparison between the two.

Gas Mileage:
2005: 24 City / 32 Highway
2006: 21 City / 29 Highway
Winner: 2005

Horsepower:
2005: 189 hp @ 5800 RPM
2006: 201 @ 6200 PRM
Winner: 2006

Torque:
2005: 192 @ 3500 RPM
2004: 181 @ 2,700 - 5,000 rpm
Close Call. The 2005 has more torque but makes it later and probably doesn't hold it throughout the RPM band as long as the 2006.

Curb Weight:
2005: 3250 lbs
2006: 3405 lbs
Winner: 2005

Power to Weight:
2005: 3250 / 189 = 17.2 Hp per lb
2006: 3405 / 201 = 16.9 Hp per lb
Winner: 2005

So I guess the jury is out on this one. I only really compared the performance aspects of the two cars since from what I could tell most everything is the same between the model years, such as dimensions and features.

Looks like the performance between the two are very close. I'm sure the NA V6 will be a smoother ride and be easier to modify than the supercharged four. But man I love the whine of that charger and the "kompressor” badging. Plus better gas mileage isn’t all that bad either.

To remove this ad, register today or login if you already are registered!

Saprissa · 07-21-2005, 03:09 PM

more reasons to love my C320's

CitronC230K_03 · 07-21-2005, 03:47 PM

im very happy with my M271. though more low end torque and to be a little quicker off the line would be nice at times, im still happy with my 4-banger!

mick1 · 07-21-2005, 04:04 PM

how about expected reliability ?

I have a feeling that the newer V6 would have better reliability since it doesn't have to work as hard as the 4 cylinder engine.

anyway, if i had two cars to choose from, the 05 c230 and the 06 c230, i would pick the 06 simply because it was the newer model.

skahung · 07-21-2005, 04:18 PM

Maybe in 2007 they'll have V6 with Supercharger, then '05 & '06 owners both will cry. :p

Saprissa · 07-21-2005, 04:20 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by skahung

Maybe in 2007 they'll have V6 with Supercharger, then '05 & '06 owners both will cry. :p

that would be the 2002-2004 C32 (V6 w/ K)

skahung · 07-21-2005, 04:21 PM

<<<<*starts crying*

Burnt Toast · 07-21-2005, 04:23 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Saprissa

that would be the 2002-2004 C32 (V6 w/ K)

yep and if they did that i doubt the price would stay at what its selling for now. if it dose C32 resale will drop like a rock.

ctC230K · 07-21-2005, 05:03 PM

eh forget the 2006 c230 i want a C55

skahung · 07-21-2005, 05:13 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ctC230K

eh forget the 2006 c230 i want a C55

I love the big Sister too (C55), but after hearing my friend saying how much gas goes in her...forget it! He spends $100-$200 on Gas each WEEK

BabyBenz6spd · 07-21-2005, 05:58 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by skahung

I love the big Sister too (C55), but after hearing my friend saying how much gas goes in her...forget it! He spends $100-$200 on Gas each WEEK

Are you serious? $100 will get me 3 FULL TANK of gas! (1000 or more miles) Does he go on road trip every week or something?

skahung · 07-21-2005, 07:33 PM

well, he drives alot

whoot? 3 full tanks with $100...no way, fillup for me is $40-45

Mason00 · 07-21-2005, 07:49 PM

The Fact of the matter remains that until people actually DRIVE the 2006 C230 SS for at least 1000 miles, all these stupid stat figures mean nothing.

BabyBenz6spd · 07-21-2005, 10:58 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by skahung

well, he drives alot

whoot? 3 full tanks with $100...no way, fillup for me is $40-45

Maybe gas is more expansive in Boston, I get my gas in Indiana and Chicago area. Which average about $2.48 per gallon for premiums @ BP

Burnt Toast · 07-21-2005, 11:08 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BabyBenz6spd

Maybe gas is more expansive in Boston, I get my gas in Indiana and Chicago area. Which average about $2.48 per gallon for premiums @ BP

i just payed $2.74 for 91

Buellwinkle · 07-21-2005, 11:59 PM

As your car slows down in the summer heat you would appreciate the V6 but at 3400+ lbs, that's a porker, almost Audi A4 weight.

jan ken po · 07-22-2005, 12:12 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Burnt Toast

i just payed $2.74 for 91

$2.09 for 91. Man I love the South.

mbny · 07-22-2005, 01:00 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jan ken po

$2.09 for 91. Man I love the South.

wow, that's awesome. $2.73 a gallon for 93 here on Long Island

mbny · 07-22-2005, 01:13 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Buellwinkle

As your car slows down in the summer heat you would appreciate the V6 but at 3400+ lbs, that's a porker, almost Audi A4 weight.

weighs more than the A4 2.0T but just a touch less than the 3.2 quattro. but i hear what your saying. car does feel abit heavy and you can really feel it around the turns. only thing i like about the C320 when i test drove it, was the little extra torque. but after comparing specs and test driving a manual C320, i couldn't pass down the C230. only 26 less hp (figured one or two grand could close that gap on minor engine mods), 200 pounds lighter and almost $9,000 less. i wasn't impressed with the 320's performance (probably cause i was still driving my 330) and couldn't justify $9k for 26 more hp and half a second 0-60 difference.

r3v1ls · 07-22-2005, 02:49 AM

$2.39 for ****ing REGULAR

. Damn los angeles...

nlpamg · 07-22-2005, 03:08 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by mbny

weighs more than the A4 2.0T but just a touch less than the 3.2 quattro. but i hear what your saying. car does feel abit heavy and you can really feel it around the turns. only thing i like about the C320 when i test drove it, was the little extra torque. but after comparing specs and test driving a manual C320, i couldn't pass down the C230. only 26 less hp (figured one or two grand could close that gap on minor engine mods), 200 pounds lighter and almost $9,000 less. i wasn't impressed with the 320's performance (probably cause i was still driving my 330) and couldn't justify $9k for 26 more hp and half a second 0-60 difference.

Saprissa · 07-22-2005, 03:09 AM

San Diego is a bit worse... $2.51 for 87 $2.63 for 89 and $2.75 for 91

PC Valkyrie · 07-22-2005, 09:50 AM

In the latest issue of Road & Track, they test the new A4 2.0T Quattro sedan with a 6 speed manual transmission and sport package. This engine has 200HP and 207 ft-lb torque.

0-60 in 6.4 seconds and 1/4 mile in 14.9 seconds
It pulled 0.86g on their skid pad and did their slalom at 65.5mph.

Compared to the 2005 or 2006 C230, the "base" A4 clearly is much faster, despite being "heavy" and with AWD. From a driving dynamics point of view the A4 clearly is the winner. Of course, other things like MB brand image and personal taste about styling/looks may still draw customers to the C230.

ctC230K · 07-22-2005, 11:13 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by mbny

weighs more than the A4 2.0T but just a touch less than the 3.2 quattro. but i hear what your saying. car does feel abit heavy and you can really feel it around the turns. only thing i like about the C320 when i test drove it, was the little extra torque. but after comparing specs and test driving a manual C320, i couldn't pass down the C230. only 26 less hp (figured one or two grand could close that gap on minor engine mods), 200 pounds lighter and almost $9,000 less. i wasn't impressed with the 320's performance (probably cause i was still driving my 330) and couldn't justify $9k for 26 more hp and half a second 0-60 difference.

when i drove the 2004 C320 I could really feel that extra power pulling the car from 0 to 60 and on the highway passing acceleration was excellent. it was also very easy to spin the tires from a stop even with an automatic! :v

Buellwinkle · 07-22-2005, 01:04 PM

Those A4's must be very fast, there was one upsidedown on the freeway today with 2 firetrucks diverting traffic until the tow trucks got there.

07-21-2005, 03:47 PM	#3
CitronC230K_03 MBWorld Fanatic! Join Date: Oct 2002 Location: San Diego, Ca Posts: 7,737 Drives: 2003 Citron Green C230KMT	im very happy with my M271. though more low end torque and to be a little quicker off the line would be nice at times, im still happy with my 4-banger! __________________ \|\|\|\|\|\| OEM Mods: Convex Mirrors, Illuminated DoorSills, SL E-Brake Pad, W211 Indicators, COMAND, AMG Sways, AeroWipers, Climatronic, Electronic Folding Mirrors, AMG Brakes, PTS (Full), 2004 armrest, UHI, Linguatronic, OEM FireExtinguisher, full 2005 exterior, IMS, MB Sirius, Argos Bluetooth Mods: 20mm Spacers, SilverMesh, 6000k Philips Ultinon, PIAA Ion Yellow Fogs Scheduled Mods: CLK Heated/Vented Ortho. Seats, AMG spoiler

07-21-2005, 04:04 PM	#4
mick1 MBWorld Fanatic! Join Date: Jul 2004 Posts: 2,015 Drives: 2005 C320wz	how about expected reliability ? I have a feeling that the newer V6 would have better reliability since it doesn't have to work as hard as the 4 cylinder engine. anyway, if i had two cars to choose from, the 05 c230 and the 06 c230, i would pick the 06 simply because it was the newer model. __________________ 2005 brilliant silver C320wz with 6-speed manual, black leather, split fold down rear seat, lighting package, sunroof package, entertainment package, and dvd comand navigation

07-21-2005, 05:03 PM	#9
ctC230K MBWorld Fanatic! Join Date: Feb 2005 Location: Connecticut Posts: 3,543 Drives: excites your girlfriend	eh forget the 2006 c230 i want a C55 __________________ 1999 BMW 323i: iForged Equips 18x9.5, Borla Catback Exhaust, Eibach Pro System Plus Suspension, M-sport control arms with polyurethane bushings, UUC adjustable rear control arms, K&N Intake, Shark Injector Software, Rogue Engineering Octane Short Shift Kit, M3 Weighted Short Shift Knob, AC Schnitzer Aluminum Race Pedals, Smoked LED Tails and Corners/Sidemarkers, Black/silver carbon fiber badges and eyelids, Valentine1, Sirius

07-21-2005, 11:59 PM	#16
Buellwinkle MBWorld Fanatic! Join Date: Nov 2001 Location: Laguna Niguel, CA Posts: 6,187	As your car slows down in the summer heat you would appreciate the V6 but at 3400+ lbs, that's a porker, almost Audi A4 weight. __________________ 2004.5 C230K Sport Sedan - Pewter/Charcoal - 6-spd - Comand 1998 SLK230 - White www.Buellwinkle.com

07-22-2005, 02:49 AM	#20
r3v1ls Super Member Join Date: Jan 2005 Location: Los Angeles Posts: 832 Drives: C 230K Coupé	$2.39 for ****ing REGULAR . Damn los angeles... __________________ 2002 Black C230k, 6-sp Manual, Charcoal Interior

07-21-2005, 03:09 PM	#2
Saprissa Super Moderator Join Date: Jun 2003 Location: San Diego, CA & San Jose, Costa Rica & Stuttgart, Germany Posts: 9,499 Drives: 1959 220S / 1979 230 G / 2002 A210 AMG / 2003 C320 SC / 2004.5 C320 SS / 2005 ML350 SE / 2008 smart	more reasons to love my C320's

07-21-2005, 04:18 PM	#5
skahung Senior Member Join Date: May 2005 Location: mars Posts: 466 Drives: bike	Maybe in 2007 they'll have V6 with Supercharger, then '05 & '06 owners both will cry. :p

07-21-2005, 04:21 PM	#7
skahung Senior Member Join Date: May 2005 Location: mars Posts: 466 Drives: bike	<<<<starts crying

07-21-2005, 07:33 PM	#12
skahung Senior Member Join Date: May 2005 Location: mars Posts: 466 Drives: bike	well, he drives alot whoot? 3 full tanks with $100...no way, fillup for me is $40-45

07-21-2005, 07:49 PM	#13
Mason00 Member Join Date: Nov 2004 Location: Toronto CANADA Posts: 106	The Fact of the matter remains that until people actually DRIVE the 2006 C230 SS for at least 1000 miles, all these stupid stat figures mean nothing.

07-22-2005, 03:09 AM	#22
Saprissa Super Moderator Join Date: Jun 2003 Location: San Diego, CA & San Jose, Costa Rica & Stuttgart, Germany Posts: 9,499 Drives: 1959 220S / 1979 230 G / 2002 A210 AMG / 2003 C320 SC / 2004.5 C320 SS / 2005 ML350 SE / 2008 smart	San Diego is a bit worse... $2.51 for 87 $2.63 for 89 and $2.75 for 91

07-22-2005, 09:50 AM	#23
PC Valkyrie Super Member Join Date: Apr 2004 Location: Canada Posts: 791 Drives: A4 1.8T Avant, C55 AMG, 135i	A4 2.0T blows away the C230 (2005 or 2006 model) In the latest issue of Road & Track, they test the new A4 2.0T Quattro sedan with a 6 speed manual transmission and sport package. This engine has 200HP and 207 ft-lb torque. 0-60 in 6.4 seconds and 1/4 mile in 14.9 seconds It pulled 0.86g on their skid pad and did their slalom at 65.5mph. Compared to the 2005 or 2006 C230, the "base" A4 clearly is much faster, despite being "heavy" and with AWD. From a driving dynamics point of view the A4 clearly is the winner. Of course, other things like MB brand image and personal taste about styling/looks may still draw customers to the C230. __________________ My track videos: http://www.youtube.com/user/PCValkyrie

07-22-2005, 01:04 PM	#25
Buellwinkle MBWorld Fanatic! Join Date: Nov 2001 Location: Laguna Niguel, CA Posts: 6,187	Those A4's must be very fast, there was one upsidedown on the freeway today with 2 firetrucks diverting traffic until the tow trucks got there. __________________ 2004.5 C230K Sport Sedan - Pewter/Charcoal - 6-spd - Comand 1998 SLK230 - White www.Buellwinkle.com

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)

Thread Tools	Search this Thread
Show Printable Version Email this Page	Search this Thread: Advanced Search
Display Modes	Rate This Thread
Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Switch to Threaded Mode	Rate This Thread: