![]() |
![]() |
|
|||||||
| Home | Register | Photo Gallery | FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Used Cars | Vendor Directory |
| C-Class (W204) 2008-Present: C180K, C200K, C230, C280, C300, C350, C200CDI, C220CDI, C320CDI |
| Welcome to MBWorld.org! |
|
|
Welcome to MBWorld, You are currently viewing our forum as a guest, which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our community, at no cost, you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is free, fast and simple, so please join our community today! |
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
#1 | |||
|
Newbie
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 12
|
2009 Mercedes-Benz C300 vs. 2009 Mercedes-Benz CLK350 article
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Almost a Member!
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Boston
Posts: 48
Drives: C300
|
my uncle drives a CLK and i gotta say he is envious of my C
__________________
![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Member
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 82
|
What about the 2009 C350? The 3.5L engine on the new W204 chassis...
Regards, |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Newbie
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 11
Drives: 2000 CLK 320 Designo
|
Many years ago when I bought my 2000 CLK, I also test drove the E; I felt like the E was quite a bit "softer" of a drive with less feel for the road. I was looking for something with a sportier drive, so I wouldn't say that a CLK is necessarily "next" from an E - they are just different. A couple days ago I sat in the 2009 models but only drove a CLS; if I went on cockpit environment, I would still say the same - and E & CLK shouldn't be put sequentially - they still feel different. But, if you mean "next" in comparison to growing older; I would put the CLK as something you want when you're in your 20's and then the E when you're in your 30's. (Assuming you follow typical American adult-male-maturity-patterns - sorry maybe that's inappropriate to assume here.)
For years I've taken 1 or 2 passengers in the back of my CLK for less-than-one-hour rides, without complaints. (Also have fit THREE in the back - mind you two of them were 100-pound women). But, I'm always considerate and bring my driver's seat pretty far forward if someone's sitting behind me, ad I recommend the same to the front passenger. While the SL has always had the hottest styling & ultimate driving experience in my opinion, my need/want to carry extra passengers regularly makes my owning an SL impractical, until I can afford TWO MB's! |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Super Member
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 868
Drives: 2008 C300 Sport
|
I guess it is a moot thing now. The CLK is now history. Too bad, always liked that car, just couldn't afford it.
__________________
'08 C300 Sport/Barolo Red/Gray-Black Leather/6 SP/AMG Wheels/iPod/P2/MultiMedia/Tele Aid '09 Passion Coupe/Gray Metallic/Black Tridion/Comfort Package/Solid Roof/Premium Sound/Fog Lights/Clock-Tach/Anti-Theft/Navigation/Bluetooth |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Tags |
| 2009, 350, benz, c300, clk, clk350, complaints, driving, experience, jersey, merceded, mercedes, road, test, tests |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|