![]() |
![]() |
|
|||||||
| Home | Register | Photo Gallery | FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Used Cars | Vendor Directory |
| C63 AMG (W204) Discuss the C63 AMG Forum Sponsored by: Kleemann USA ![]() |
| Welcome to MBWorld.org! |
|
|
Welcome to MBWorld, You are currently viewing our forum as a guest, which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our community, at no cost, you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is free, fast and simple, so please join our community today! |
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
#51 | ||||
|
MBWorld Fanatic!
|
__________________
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
#52 |
|
Member
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: WA
Posts: 134
Drives: 2005 Porsche Cayenne Turbo
|
Love the rims/drop on your car!
__________________
2005 Porsche Cayenne Turbo w/ TechArt kit 2005 Cadillac CTS-V (Maggied) 480whp/445wtq (SOLD) http://www.fquick.com/SeattleBum |
|
|
|
|
|
#53 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Dallas TX area
Posts: 389
Drives: M5, C63, 335Ci
|
GM has picked up their game with the latest CTS-V and I can also say the MB did the same with the C63. I've never owned a Caddy, but would buy a CTS-V. I've owned previous AMGs and they never quite drove like a BMW until I drove the C63. MB got it right with this car.
You really can't go wrong with either option. Last edited by qship5; 03-03-2009 at 09:43 PM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#54 |
|
Super Member
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Miami, FL
Posts: 606
Drives: 09' C63 AMG
|
Dude you answered the question yourself....
"I've also spent the last 13 years of my life not paying the least bit of attention to American car brands, just knowing they were junk..." American Cars = CRAP! Yeah, so what the caddy has more bhp, it still doesn’t beat the Benz... its heavy, bigger, and handles like a goofy fat kid. If the price is not your issue, than 100% without any doubt in your mind you should be leaning towards the C63. PLUS, with a minor ECU tune you can have the over 500bhp in the Benz, depending on your size but I think the smaller 4 door is much sportier and will be an advantage all around when it comes to performance. You cannot compare a German car like this to an American car with a huge engine stuck in it, literally... I don’t even see the comparison unless it’s the money thing... or unless you like American sports cars, which some people simply do, which I will never understand... Just my opinion, good luck!
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
|
#55 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 141
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#56 |
|
Super Member
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Miami, FL
Posts: 606
Drives: 09' C63 AMG
|
First, yes weight make a difference, even 400lbs... Second, I did not say the benz name overcomes any other vehicle, but if you can honestly say that American sport cars are in the same league as German sport cars than you are oblivious to the truth. And for over 100 more horses, it is barely faster, and that doesn’t mean everything... what about brakes, suspension, interior quality, etc, etc, etc...
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
|
#57 |
|
MBWorld Fanatic!
|
Thanks! But the drop is a PS-job.
I live in Houston (Pothole Town), so I decided not to drop the car. I'm tempted to drop the C63 that I'm looking to get later this year though.....
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
|
#58 |
|
Senior Member
|
Ok,... just got in from burning gas around Bmore County and City. Guess what's sittin' out in my driveway,... a Black Raven Cadillac CTS-V with Light Titanium Recaro's. Took the AMG back thinking I'd be driving my C32 home, but ended up leaving the C32 at the dealership and driving the V home. So basically, I had the Benz un-supervised the first part of the day and the V un-supervised the second part of the day. Man, this thing is loaded,... Nav, HD & Sat radio, 19" Polished wheels, etc. Only thing missing on this thing is a f'ing engine block heater. The Pilot Sport 2 footprint on the V is ridiculous,... hell, the fronts are wider than the rears on the Benz. Just noticed that today. And the V's interior compared to the C63's is like comparing the Impala to a Belair,... no, a Biscayne! I'm honestly shocked that merc has allowed GM to out-appoint and out-comfort their interior and human space. But the lateral support of the performance seat option this thing comes with is nothing compared to the support the Benz offers. The second time looking at all this stitching, well it ain't as bad as I remember the first time. Kinda reminded me of a baseball glove, now it doesn't look that much out of place or overdone anymore. Still overdone though in my opinion. But the glossy piano black is slammin'. A touch nicely done there. The one thing that worries me is the fake suede all over the place,... including the steering wheel. Not sure how that's gonna hold up and begin to detract from everything else. And what can I say about the Bose 5.1,... very nice! Loud and balanced,... not boomy like how I remember Americans used to tune their audio systems. I was disappoint to learn that remote start is only available with the automatic. Damn! As far as exhaust note,... the Benz takes that hands down, however, when you open up the throttle the V does get sorta loud. But it just doesn't have the mellow thunder the C63 delivers. I can now say with almost absolute certainty, the C63 wouldn't stand a chance on the street with the V. According to my but dyno, the V has way more acceleration. There's a connecting highway where I live that basically connects Baltimore's Beltway to a place called Westminster, MD. Get pass the Subway Depot and it's very straight. Did a WOT from a couple on ramps and before I knew it I was int three digits. After years in my C32, three digits aren't suppose to sneak up on me like that. But they did. Impressive,... this thing is impressive. Didn't do any back roads,... too much ice and slush still on the ground to feel safe, especially at night. Oh yeah, there's not as much SC whirl as I was hoping it would be. They've done something to quite that down. Sorta disappointing,... like I said earlier, I got used to that. But it does have a PSI guage to let you know you need to get your foot out of it,... that's if you wanna make it to the next gas station.
The Caddy salesman saw me drive in with the C63. When I told him that I had not decided yet but they allowed me to drive the 63 to work while they serviced my 32, he arranged for me to take the V. Hell yeah,... the 32 is spending her 2nd night away from home. The Caddy guy gave me this book with an interesting read about Cadillac auto sport. Did you guys know that the 09 V is considered to be the fastest Sedan on the planet. It holds the current record lap time at the ring for its class and amoung performance cars with 4 doors. I see someone elluded to this a few posts up. And playing around with the V, I do believe the 0-60 in 3.9,... with a little practice locking up, I do feel it's possible. I really wanted this thing to fail,... to fall flat on it's face in the presence of the C63. But it held it's own. Now for some truth and honesty. I didn't push the 63 as much as I pushed the V. I had the 63 during daylight hours and used my time with it to discover stuff, like talking to the nav system. I had promised to be back at the dealership between 5 & 6, so most of my time with it was doing stuff like negotiating afternoon rush-hour traffic, picked the 2 kids up from school, and a few other errands. Something else too,... the V has a manual trans, they always feel a tad more responsive and exhilarating. I'm still undecided, and prolly won't make up my mind until sometimes tomorrow. I gave them all my information, did my bank stuff today (down payment wise, GM is doing 0% money and Mercedes is doing 1.9 money, can't pass either of those up), so all's left is me making up my mind. Whatever I do, I'll still be at home here,... I'm keeping my 32! Last edited by ericpd; 03-04-2009 at 02:03 AM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#59 |
|
MBWorld Fanatic!
|
Sounds like you already made up your mind.
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
|
#60 | |
|
Senior Member
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#61 |
|
Senior Member
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#62 |
|
Senior Member
|
Yeah,... nice drop on that 32 TA-9FF!
Last edited by ericpd; 03-04-2009 at 01:25 AM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#63 |
|
Senior Member
|
I don't know man. Not really! I think if I had honestly and truly already made my mind up,... I'd still be out in the streets or out in the garage toyin' around with stuff. But I'm here still searching for something,... anything, to tilt me one way over the other. I think what's happening is I'm fighting the 'regret' monster. It's fairly clear that the V out-performs the C in many areas. But it ain't an AMG. There's no signature on my blower. I guess what I'm feeling is I don't want to hear myself saying I shoulda woulda a few months from tomorrow. I mean if the difference between the two were hands down, I wouldn't be sweatin' this. I know,... strange!
|
|
|
|
|
|
#64 | |||
|
Senior Member
|
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
I do agree however, that the smaller size of the C is more to my liking. But it's not like I'm looking at a E class when really wanting a C class. This thing falls between the E and the C. it's not as small as the C and M3, and not quite as big as the E and M5. Check out the deminsions someone posted early on in this thread. Uh,... I think you got that backwards. The 6.2 in the V is actually a small block design. The 6.2 in the Benz is definitely their big(gest) block. It's even heavier than their V12! No,... money is not an issue here. Excitement is, and how long that excitement will last. That's what's making the decision fairly tuff. The V is cheaper BTW. |
|||
|
|
|
|
|
#65 |
|
Super Member
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Miami, FL
Posts: 606
Drives: 09' C63 AMG
|
Regret you will.
![]() ![]()
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
|
#66 |
|
Senior Member
|
Yeah,... I'm hearin' ya! That same thought is lurking around in the back of my head as well. I just wished the C was as exciting as that V sittin' outside. Just came back in,... had to go out and check something out about the nav unit I just read about in the Owner's Manual. I don't think you can talk to the nav in the V (voice activated). At least if you can, I'm not doin' a very good job of figuring it out. But guess what I did discover, in addition to XM radio, this thing comes with XM weather AND traffic too. AND,... not only do the Recaro seats heat on driver and passenger side fronts, they also have cooling ventalation,... sorta like the S class.
I know my neighbors are thinking I'm either crazy, had a fight with the wife, or trying to commit suicide by sitting in a running car in near freezing temps in the middle of the night! F'em! I'm tryin' to figure this crap out! LOL! Well just to let them know I'm ok,... I took one last ride to the nearby 7-eleven and grabbed a cup of coffee. As soon as I finish this last post and this coffee, I'm done. Thanks again for listening and advising guys. Buy the time you hear from me again, I would have by then signed my name a ton of times and will be the owner of a brand new......... Poof! |
|
|
|
|
|
#67 | |
|
Super Member
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: N.Jersey and New York, stationed in Germany
Posts: 517
Drives: 1994 C280(5speed manual) 1999 C230k station wagon
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#68 |
|
Member
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 141
|
an important aspect is also how much of a "driver" are you ? do you have a preferance for a manual or an auto ? Do you get bored fast with an auto ? Do you like to eat, drink, and talk on the cell at the same time ? Ask your wife - which one does she like better ? Which one does she think is more masculine ? lol, you can't get a better outside/foreign opinion than from the wifey
|
|
|
|
|
|
#69 |
|
Newbie
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Radnor, PA
Posts: 10
Drives: 07 SL55AMG
|
And The Winner Is?????
Regardless of which car you choose - you hopefully will be happy with your choice as time goes by.
The Cadillac/GM is a VERY good effort, with many features that make it appealing. However - the pedigree of a Mercedes Benz, especially an AMG, is something which no other manufacturer can hope to equal. Sure, many are trying: BMW M, Lexus F, Cadillac/GM V, etc. - but keep in mind who is the leader and who are followers. Valiant efforts buy all trying to "best the best". Let us know what you decide.
__________________
2007 SL55AMG Black/Ash/Carbon Fiber |
|
|
|
|
|
#70 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: WA
Posts: 134
Drives: 2005 Porsche Cayenne Turbo
|
Quote:
The 2009 CTS-V is a completely different car from the 2004-2007 CTS-V. In fact, it's an entirely different car for GM, period.
__________________
2005 Porsche Cayenne Turbo w/ TechArt kit 2005 Cadillac CTS-V (Maggied) 480whp/445wtq (SOLD) http://www.fquick.com/SeattleBum |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#71 | |
|
Super Member
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 638
Drives: a durr
|
Quote:
__________________
![]() ![]()
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#72 |
|
Member
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: WA
Posts: 134
Drives: 2005 Porsche Cayenne Turbo
|
Modded 2009 CTS-V (automatic). Keep in mind this car has only been out for 2 months...only more goodies to come!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vd5lx...&cart=faGHzpHj target="_blank"&feature=player_embedded
__________________
2005 Porsche Cayenne Turbo w/ TechArt kit 2005 Cadillac CTS-V (Maggied) 480whp/445wtq (SOLD) http://www.fquick.com/SeattleBum |
|
|
|
|
|
#73 |
|
Member
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Marlton, NJ
Posts: 90
Drives: 2008 M5 (metallic sapphire black), 2007 GL450 (black)
|
+1,
Interesting thread! I'm also considering the CTS-V, but coming from E60 M5. When my local dealer got a few CTS-Vs in earlier this year, they called me to take a look. I must say the exhaust note is quite impressive and the interior is very nice. If talking performance, the CTS-V is on top at the moment. And who can complain about the price? For me, it comes down to price. For equal or better performance, but 25-30k less money, it's a no brainer. Will probably get the Caddy if it is still offered next year. Since GM is disbanding their High Performance Division, not sure if it will still be available, other than existing stock.
__________________
Shih-han "Quitters never win; Winners never quit; Those who never quit and never win are idiots..." |
|
|
|
|
|
#74 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: WA
Posts: 134
Drives: 2005 Porsche Cayenne Turbo
|
Quote:
My thoughts: you already have an M5 which is 99% as fast at the CTS-V. Why take a hit on selling it? What about a nice Dinan S2 package?
__________________
2005 Porsche Cayenne Turbo w/ TechArt kit 2005 Cadillac CTS-V (Maggied) 480whp/445wtq (SOLD) http://www.fquick.com/SeattleBum |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#75 |
|
MBWorld Fanatic!
|
Unfortunately I have to somewhat, but not FULLY agree to this.
Don't forget that the 190E EVO was no slouch.
__________________
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Tags |
| 2009, amg, c63, cls55, comments, cts, ctsv, e90, gear, m3, mod, pulley, reliability, s4, top |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|