Go Back   MBWorld.org Forums > Mercedes-Benz AMG Vehicles > C63 AMG (W204)

C63 AMG (W204) Discuss the C63 AMG
Forum Sponsored by: Kleemann USA

Welcome to MBWorld.org!
Welcome to MBWorld,

You are currently viewing our forum as a guest, which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our community, at no cost, you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is free, fast and simple, so please join our community today!


Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Rate Thread Display Modes
Old 11-05-2009, 12:20 AM   #26
Super Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Palos Verdes/La Jolla
Posts: 566
Drives: '09 C63
I don't think it'll ever make it's away across the ocean to us...the e46 m3 csl never made it here either To remove this ad, register today or login if you already are registered!

Jae Duk is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-05-2009, 12:28 AM   #27
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
SebringSilver's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Vancouver, Canada
Posts: 2,367
Drives: C63 AMG (summer beater), B7 S4 (winter beater)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jae Duk View Post
I don't think it'll ever make it's away across the ocean to us...the e46 m3 csl never made it here either
You're probably right. But there's arguably a bigger market for this car State-side than anywhere else. Shame, really.
__________________
"300 horsepower is fast. 400 will take your breath away. That's why we gave it 451."©
SebringSilver is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 11-05-2009, 05:04 AM   #28
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 78
Drives: c63
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sincity View Post
This looks more like a CLK BS competitor. Though the wing is functional (plus it would make Hiro63 happy), it is FUGLY!
Your right!!! I LOVE this car. It made me happy

We need AMG to do something with C63 or do something with coupe. I dont like loosing to M3. I think its our biggest rival. Maybe make limited amount like 190E Evo 2. Maybe call it like C63 Cup Car?
HIRO63 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-05-2009, 06:06 AM   #29
Super Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Palos Verdes/La Jolla
Posts: 566
Drives: '09 C63
How about clc BS AMG
Well I heard rumors that next one might be C class and seeing how 2 door C class is coming out soon who knows
Or maybe they'll rob us of that as well just like they robbed us of the SLK
Jae Duk is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-05-2009, 07:58 AM   #30
Senior Member
 
F1Bobby's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: People's Republic of California (Southern Region)
Posts: 342
Drives: C55 AMG
I'm sure we'll probably see a 17 year old driving one on the 405.
F1Bobby is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-05-2009, 11:01 AM   #31
Pork Eating Crusader
 
Cylinder Head's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: NJ
Posts: 4,501
Drives: '06 M5 LOADED, '97 RSP Supra- 790rwhp on pump, '05 Escalade EXT
Send a message via AIM to Cylinder Head
Quote:
Originally Posted by JZ_63AMG View Post
GTS= garbage
Care to elaborate? Because from the early press on this car, it's going to shatter everything.
__________________
'07 Barbie Scooter
'06 M5
'97 RSP Supra GT76DBB
Glock: Austrian for "Lemming"
Strong people are harder to kill than weak people, and generally more useful.
Cylinder Head is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-05-2009, 12:47 PM   #32
Member
 
mzporto's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Sao Paulo, Brazil
Posts: 142
Drives: 2009 C63 AMG / 2007 BMW 130i M Sport
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sincity View Post
This looks more like a CLK BS competitor. Though the wing is functional (plus it would make Hiro63 happy), it is FUGLY!
HAHAHA! I can't help to grin everytime someone mentions HIRO63's GT Wing thread!!!

It's not that ugly. But agreed: it's a track dedicated car.
mzporto is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-05-2009, 03:15 PM   #33
Super Member
 
yooker's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 638
Drives: a durr
Quote:
Originally Posted by F1Bobby View Post
I'm sure we'll probably see a 17 year old driving one on the 405.
How long until someone wraps it around a pole?
__________________
yooker is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 11-05-2009, 03:33 PM   #34
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
SebringSilver's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Vancouver, Canada
Posts: 2,367
Drives: C63 AMG (summer beater), B7 S4 (winter beater)
Quote:
Originally Posted by yooker View Post
How long until someone wraps it around a pole?
Depends on when they start selling them in Poland, I guess.
__________________
"300 horsepower is fast. 400 will take your breath away. That's why we gave it 451."©
SebringSilver is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 11-05-2009, 03:59 PM   #35
SMP
Member
 
SMP's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Manhattan Beach, CA
Posts: 179
Drives: 08 MB CLK 63 black series, 09 BMW M6, 06 BMW X5 4.8iS, 06 MB SL 500
Now that's an M3 right up my alley. Hopefully it will make it stateside, and if it does, I want it. In my opinion it will be competing with the new Porsche GT3, rather than the discontinued CLK BS. Price should be right around a GT3 as well, probably $110K.
__________________

08 CLK63 BS
09 M6
06 X5 4.8is
06 SL500
SMP is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-05-2009, 05:39 PM   #36
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Richmond BC Canada
Posts: 318
Drives: C63 AMG
Quote:
Originally Posted by SMP View Post
Now that's an M3 right up my alley. Hopefully it will make it stateside, and if it does, I want it. In my opinion it will be competing with the new Porsche GT3, rather than the discontinued CLK BS. Price should be right around a GT3 as well, probably $110K.
+1

It just hit me before reading ur post

this is actually right up GT3's nose...I doubt Amg gonna make anything so hardcore to reply to this beast.

However a hardcore version of M3 or the ultimate light weight Porsche....

I would take GT3 over this anyday
__________________
07 E92 328i (SOLD)
07 Z4M Roadster (SOLD)
09 STI (SOLD)
09 C63

MikeS54 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 11-05-2009, 05:43 PM   #37
Pork Eating Crusader
 
Cylinder Head's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: NJ
Posts: 4,501
Drives: '06 M5 LOADED, '97 RSP Supra- 790rwhp on pump, '05 Escalade EXT
Send a message via AIM to Cylinder Head
Quote:
Originally Posted by yooker View Post
How long until someone wraps it around a pole?
That depends on a few factors:

1. What is the 0-60 of the GTS?
2. How far is the nearest utility pole to the first dealer that gets one in?
__________________
'07 Barbie Scooter
'06 M5
'97 RSP Supra GT76DBB
Glock: Austrian for "Lemming"
Strong people are harder to kill than weak people, and generally more useful.
Cylinder Head is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-05-2009, 05:54 PM   #38
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
NORTH 44 C55's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Toronto
Posts: 1,169
Drives: ///'05 C55 / '09 C63///
Quote:
Originally Posted by JZ_63AMG View Post
GTS= garbage
Kids!!!!
__________________
Barry


///MY2009 C63 Palladium Silver/Sahara Beige + Premium + P30 ///

MODs: VRP CF Air Box + AMG 19" V.16 Spoke Wheels & 19" P-Zeros - Carlsson DP-///AMG Performance Ctr. Ltd Edition Shift Knob///

Will be back to the track in the spring with 550+hp and R compounds...
NORTH 44 C55 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-05-2009, 05:56 PM   #39
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Richmond BC Canada
Posts: 318
Drives: C63 AMG
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cylinder Head View Post
That depends on a few factors:

1. What is the 0-60 of the GTS?
2. How far is the nearest utility pole to the first dealer that gets one in?
I have my doubt that 0-60 of this car will improve siginificantly compared to normal M3.

The E92 m3 is a heavy beast to start with i doubt that with this gts they could have bring the weight down to low 3000lb range.

I would be suprised to see the weight drop to 3400lb. However unless this thing weighs below 3400 or 3300lb theres no way its gonna be better or as good as a GT3.

Can't wait to see one on the track...
__________________
07 E92 328i (SOLD)
07 Z4M Roadster (SOLD)
09 STI (SOLD)
09 C63

MikeS54 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 11-05-2009, 06:14 PM   #40
Pork Eating Crusader
 
Cylinder Head's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: NJ
Posts: 4,501
Drives: '06 M5 LOADED, '97 RSP Supra- 790rwhp on pump, '05 Escalade EXT
Send a message via AIM to Cylinder Head
Quote:
Originally Posted by MikeS54 View Post
I have my doubt that 0-60 of this car will improve siginificantly compared to normal M3.

The E92 m3 is a heavy beast to start with i doubt that with this gts they could have bring the weight down to low 3000lb range.

I would be suprised to see the weight drop to 3400lb. However unless this thing weighs below 3400 or 3300lb theres no way its gonna be better or as good as a GT3.

Can't wait to see one on the track...
^
Didn't get the joke guy.
__________________
'07 Barbie Scooter
'06 M5
'97 RSP Supra GT76DBB
Glock: Austrian for "Lemming"
Strong people are harder to kill than weak people, and generally more useful.
Cylinder Head is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-05-2009, 06:23 PM   #41
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 76
Drives: C63
i think it looks sick honestly..it gives the car a much more aggressive look, something that the normal e92 m3 lacked. i doubt theyll bring it to the states tho considering they didnt bring the csl
W204 C63 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-05-2009, 06:51 PM   #42
Member
 
AMG ME's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Vancouver, BC
Posts: 128
Drives: C63
Another .4 litres and it can only spit out 36 more hp?

Not impressed. For that money I'll hit up a GT3 RS
__________________
AMG ME is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-05-2009, 07:05 PM   #43
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Carl Lassiter's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: L.A., CA
Posts: 2,020
Drives: '08 M5, '09 2500HD
Quote:
Originally Posted by AMG ME View Post
Another .4 litres and it can only spit out 36 more hp?

Not impressed. For that money I'll hit up a GT3 RS
That's just below 100bhp/liter. The car itself is makes precisely 100bhp/NAliter. The specific output of your 6.2, now that's unimpressive.

As for suspension geometry, well this car's the equivalent of game over for AMG.

MikeS54-- Your doubts on weight loss are ill-founded , the GTS's official weight is 3285lbs. I'd say it's fair to say the GT3 RS has more than a fight on its hands. I'd also say that, while unimportant, 0-60 will be substantially improved. Shedding almost 500lbs tends to help with that.
__________________
'08 BMW ///M5
Black/Black, SMGIII, Fully Loaded, V1

'09 GMC Sierra 2500HD
Gray/Gray, 6.6L TD, SLE ExtCab SB, 4WD, Z71
Carl Lassiter is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-05-2009, 07:07 PM   #44
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
SebringSilver's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Vancouver, Canada
Posts: 2,367
Drives: C63 AMG (summer beater), B7 S4 (winter beater)
Quote:
Originally Posted by MikeS54 View Post
I have my doubt that 0-60 of this car will improve siginificantly compared to normal M3.

The E92 m3 is a heavy beast to start with i doubt that with this gts they could have bring the weight down to low 3000lb range.

I would be suprised to see the weight drop to 3400lb. However unless this thing weighs below 3400 or 3300lb theres no way its gonna be better or as good as a GT3.

Can't wait to see one on the track...
BMW has already reported a curb weight on the pre-production car of 3,285 lbs (1,490 kg).

Edit: Oh, Carl beat me to it.
__________________
"300 horsepower is fast. 400 will take your breath away. That's why we gave it 451."©

Last edited by SebringSilver; 11-05-2009 at 07:10 PM.
SebringSilver is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 11-05-2009, 07:11 PM   #45
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
SebringSilver's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Vancouver, Canada
Posts: 2,367
Drives: C63 AMG (summer beater), B7 S4 (winter beater)
Quote:
Originally Posted by AMG ME View Post
Another .4 litres and it can only spit out 36 more hp?

Not impressed. For that money I'll hit up a GT3 RS
Apparently, one of the chief considerations for the larger displacement motor was to improve low-end torque.
__________________
"300 horsepower is fast. 400 will take your breath away. That's why we gave it 451."©
SebringSilver is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 11-05-2009, 07:38 PM   #46
Member
 
AMG ME's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Vancouver, BC
Posts: 128
Drives: C63
Quote:
Originally Posted by SebringSilver View Post
Apparently, one of the chief considerations for the larger displacement motor was to improve low-end torque.
Did they give out any new torque #s for this GTS yet?

The E46 M3 CSL was my favourite...
__________________

Last edited by AMG ME; 11-05-2009 at 07:44 PM.
AMG ME is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-05-2009, 07:41 PM   #47
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
SebringSilver's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Vancouver, Canada
Posts: 2,367
Drives: C63 AMG (summer beater), B7 S4 (winter beater)
Quote:
Originally Posted by AMG ME View Post
Did they give out any new torque #s for this GTS?

The E46 M3 CSL was my favourite...
They haven't published full specifications for the car yet, but the interview with various BMW personnel points to that (the desire for increased low-end torque) as being one of the objectives for this variation of the M3. Can't wait to see what the finished product will be capable of.
__________________
"300 horsepower is fast. 400 will take your breath away. That's why we gave it 451."©
SebringSilver is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 11-05-2009, 09:58 PM   #48
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Richmond BC Canada
Posts: 318
Drives: C63 AMG
Quote:
Originally Posted by Carl Lassiter View Post
That's just below 100bhp/liter. The car itself is makes precisely 100bhp/NAliter. The specific output of your 6.2, now that's unimpressive.

As for suspension geometry, well this car's the equivalent of game over for AMG.

MikeS54-- Your doubts on weight loss are ill-founded , the GTS's official weight is 3285lbs. I'd say it's fair to say the GT3 RS has more than a fight on its hands. I'd also say that, while unimportant, 0-60 will be substantially improved. Shedding almost 500lbs tends to help with that.

thats pretty good manage to lose more than 400lb

however a standard gt3 only way 3069lb still siginificantly less than GTS.

I just really doubt it will beat the GT3 overall but i bet its gonna come pretty close to it.
__________________
07 E92 328i (SOLD)
07 Z4M Roadster (SOLD)
09 STI (SOLD)
09 C63

MikeS54 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 11-05-2009, 10:05 PM   #49
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
jturkel's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Scottsdale, AZ
Posts: 3,748
Drives: 02 C32 AMG
Send a message via AIM to jturkel
Quote:
Originally Posted by kevinpuri View Post
You mean the "E" class coupe right? lol jp

IF the all new C class coupe is designed to go up against the 3 series coupe what is the E class coupe competing with?
uh.....the 6 series.
__________________
| 02 C32 AMG | SL55 Intake w/K&Ns | LET 185 Pulley | LET Tune | LET Heat Exchanger | Eurocharged Headers | Res Delete | NGK IX Iridiums | Magnecor KV85s | NW Pulley Saver | NW ISO Kit | Valentine1 | DashDyno SPD | CF Trunk Lip |

Waiting Install: NW oil catch can
Next: secondary cat delete, retune, coolant reservoir, intake/tb project, hooley button


jturkel is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-05-2009, 10:22 PM   #50
Senior Member
 
hhughes1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Central Florida
Posts: 479
Drives: 2009 C63 Red w/ Sahara Beige
If the car makes it stateside those seats will not. The Euro SL65BS weighs 300lbs less than the US version just due to the safety regulated seating. Bye Bye 3285lbs
__________________
__________________________________________________ ________________________________________


Life throws lots of curves...good thing there is an apex in every one of them!


2009 C63 Mars Red [MHP Long Tubes & Kleemann Tune(11.99/117.49) 44rwhp ago]
2010 GLK63(JK) Mars Red (of course)
2008 HD Screamin Eagle Springer (not Mars Red)
Specialized Tarmac SL(all cf and exotic alloys!)
hhughes1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Tags
60, amg, bc, bmw, c63, doors, fanboys, gts, lambo, m3, numbers, performance, richmond, stats, torque


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:09 AM.


Advertise on MBWorld.org - Terms of Service - Privacy Policy - Jobs
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.3.0
Copyright © 2001-2008 InternetBrands, Inc. / MBWorld.org. All Rights Reserved.