![]() |
![]() |
|
|||||||
| Home | Register | Photo Gallery | FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Used Cars | Vendor Directory |
| CLK55 AMG, CLK63 AMG (W208, W209) Discuss the past, present and future CLK55 AMG and the CLK63 AMG. |
| Welcome to MBWorld.org! |
|
|
Welcome to MBWorld, You are currently viewing our forum as a guest, which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our community, at no cost, you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is free, fast and simple, so please join our community today! |
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
#1 | |||
|
Newbie
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
Posts: 17
Drives: 2002 CLK 55
|
Front alignment question with those with H&R (w208)
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Senior Member
|
make sure your wheel don't kit the fender when you switch out the pad for a lower no. one...
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Senior Member
|
hit the fender I meant
__________________
01 W208 55 AMG EX- SC 99 Porsche 996 Carrera 08 E92 335 stage II kit - 350whp |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
MBWorld Fanatic!
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Georgia
Posts: 1,045
Drives: SL 55 030, ML, E55, bunch of old ones
|
I doubt very seriously...
tha you'll be able to get back to anything close to stock camber on the fronts. Even with the higher pads, the H&R's for the 208's are quite low. I used the factory crash (camber) bolts and was unable to get it to where I wanted it. The Kmac probably has more adjustability though. Those cars are just quite camber sensitive; not only do they get "all over the road", but have much more steering effort and correction with too much negative. This was one of the main reasons I sold my car. I did have better results with the Factory Euro 55 springs than the H&R however. Hope this helps.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Newbie
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
Posts: 17
Drives: 2002 CLK 55
|
Well I received the whole KMAC kit front and rear and will be installing it in the next day or so. As far as I know the factory crash bolts provide maybe 1 degree of adjustment for the front. I know the factory stock adjustment allows for only about 3 tenths of a degree of adjustment as stated by MB. The Kmac Kit I think allows for up to 3 degres of movement maybe even more from the looks of it. I will follow up as to what the alignment ends up being. My whole idea behind all of this to be able to lower the car and have it retain factory drivability with optimal tire ware. I hope this works or this with be alot time wasted and alot of cash flushed down the crapper. I just installed the new 19's and refuse to drive it until it is aligned properly.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Almost a Member!
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: STL
Posts: 42
Drives: '05 Audi S4
|
I had a 430, so the suspension is a little different, but I was able to get mine in specs. The car drove perfect. I used the KMAC front kit and rear camber arms from Jeff on the forum. Make sure you find a garage that knows about suspension, I went to at least 5 places b4 i felt confident. They set the front at 1.5 and the rear at 1.2. I had great tire wear and great traction. I had the HR's and #2pads in front and #2pads in rear. I also had 18.5 in front and 18.9 rims in back. No rubbing even with four people in the car. It wasn't cheap, but nothing on this car is, I pd around $400.
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|