![]() |
![]() |
|
|||||||
| Home | Register | Photo Gallery | FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Used Cars | Vendor Directory |
| CLK55 AMG, CLK63 AMG (W208, W209) Discuss the past, present and future CLK55 AMG and the CLK63 AMG. |
| Welcome to MBWorld.org! |
|
|
Welcome to MBWorld, You are currently viewing our forum as a guest, which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our community, at no cost, you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is free, fast and simple, so please join our community today! |
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
#1 | |||
|
Super Moderator
|
This is KarlK's new motto
__________________
![]() John MBWorld.org Moderator 2008 BMW ///M3 |
|||
|
|
|
|
|
#2 | |
|
MBWorld Fanatic!
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Florida
Posts: 2,065
Drives: 2002 CLK 55 AMG Coupe ;)
|
Re: This is KarlK's new motto
Quote:
Tnx! Well put - however it must be narrowed to the 2002 CLK55 AMG. Here is why: I was at out favorite MB dealership today and picked up the new 2003 CLK brochure. On page 21 (CLK AMG) and page 31(specification) it states clearly: 0-60 mph acceleration is 5.0 seconds! The 2003 CLK55 AMG Coupe is slower than my "way of life" the 2002 CLK55 AMG, which MB rated conservatively 0-60 mph as 4.9 seconds. Hopefully this will lay to rest the previous 0-60 km times for the metrically challenged!! Additionally, as discussed many times, I prefer the CLK 208 design over the new 209 - by far. That's why I proudly say: The 2002 CLK55 AMG Coupe is the best car ever produced since Karl Benz patented the world's first motorcar in 1886, which is considered as the official birth certificate of the first motor car!
__________________
2002 CLK55 ////AMG brilliant silver & charcoal nappa GPS Comand & Escort 8500 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Member
|
I love both the 208 and 209
![]() Both damn beautiful cars imo. Mercedes-Benz doesn't make a car that is ugly imo.
__________________
Alex, Mercedes-Benz addict |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Super Moderator
|
Karl, what's your take on the SL55?
__________________
![]() John MBWorld.org Moderator 2008 BMW ///M3 |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 | |
|
MBWorld Fanatic!
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Florida
Posts: 2,065
Drives: 2002 CLK 55 AMG Coupe ;)
|
Quote:
I think the supercharger is superfluous. Since I am NOT a NASCAR driver, I prefer the naturally aspirated AMGs. 400 HPs would be fine for the weighty 2 tons + SL. 500 HPs is overkill. MB added this 500 HPs supercharged AMG engine to compete with Turbo Porsches, Vipers, Ferraris, Aston Martins... The new SL is an aesthetic triumph. Unfortunately, for me it's too short, - not enough legroom.
__________________
2002 CLK55 ////AMG brilliant silver & charcoal nappa GPS Comand & Escort 8500 |
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|