![]() |
![]() |
|
|||||||
| Home | Register | Photo Gallery | FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Used Cars | Vendor Directory |
| CLK55 AMG, CLK63 AMG (W208, W209) Discuss the past, present and future CLK55 AMG and the CLK63 AMG. |
| Welcome to MBWorld.org! |
|
|
Welcome to MBWorld, You are currently viewing our forum as a guest, which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our community, at no cost, you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is free, fast and simple, so please join our community today! |
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
#1 | |||
|
Member
|
Put some wheels on and got some problems!!!!
__________________
![]() |
|||
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Member
|
anybody...
__________________
![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
MBWorld Fanatic!
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Hotlanta
Posts: 7,887
Drives: AMG
|
I'd be guessing....but here goes.
A PLUS 3 fitment might be completely throwing the wheel sensors off....compare the stock rolling diameter (front and rear) to the setup you have now. Another suggestion is to pop an email off to Luke at Tirerack as I'm sure he has seen this situation on occasion. I'm sure you're not the first guy to squeeze 20s on a W208. How are you fitting 285s in the rear?? Aren't you rubbing? Have you tried going back to your old wheels to see if the issue goes away?
__________________
W208 CLK55 - 2002 (Silver w/Charcoal - 43K miles) 1 of 3,381 W208 AMG Coupes Worldwide 304WHP / 321TQ - Stock! W124 Estate - 1995 MBWGCM #71 Kombi's Uber Alles Member #3 |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Member
|
well i put it on the odbII and it throws 2 speed sensor codes 0500 and 0700. So I have a tech (here at Nissan) looking at it now to see if the wires are still good. The fitment is pretty tight on the rear tires. The offset is a plus 40 so when in the air the tires are actually on the body of the car. They can't spin at all. But once you drop the car on the ground it clears by a hair...or at least it will clear clompletely once the little piece of rubber is rubbed off the body from the lip of the tire touching it...just barely. The front was my biggest problem. I went with 245s and they wouldn't fit b/c is hit the top joint. That sucks. I had to go with a skinny tire. I will most likely put a hubcentric spacer in there and go 245 next time I need tires. Looks good tho. Once I get all this bs worked out.
__________________
![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Virginia Beach,VA
Posts: 468
Drives: 2002 clk430
|
pics please
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Super Member
|
damn...post pics, i need to see this..are you lowered ?
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
SPONSOR
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Long Island, NY
Posts: 898
Drives: Any AMG Thats Around..
|
lugs too long? hitting the hub? or ripping the e brake cable out of the rear?
i ran 17's in front and 18's in the rear for 3 weeks i had no lights or anything out of the norm.... and i had 20's on my W202 C.. and also no lights.... Something is rubbing... or rubbed something the wrong way....
__________________
Have Facebook? Join Our Fan Page!! T-Shirts Coming Soon!! Check the website for updates! Visit Our MySpace Page. Visit Our YouTube Page. Auto Addiction ltd. Lindenhurst, NY sales@autoaddiction.com http://www.autoaddiction.com NY's Authorized indy RennTech Dealer! Authorized Evosport Dealer! Performance, Maintenance/Service, Heavy Repairs, Body Kits, Wheels.
Last edited by TuneTime; 04-23-2008 at 03:32 AM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#8 | |
|
Member
|
Quote:
thats exactly what happened the 1st time they put the rims on..>The lugs were too long and when they test drove the car they said it was clicking from the lugs hitting something so they took the lugs back out and put shorter ones instead. Do you think that damaged something to cause the lights? What would it have damaged if anything?I had never had any lights come on prior to this happening.
__________________
![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Member
|
spoke to a guy at Benz today and he suggested that the front right speed sensor may be bad since thats the one sending signal to the transmission control module. I have to go get it checked out after work (hopefully today)
__________________
![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Member
|
I read the codes and they came up for
0720 Speed sensor 0500 Vehicle Speed sensor tried to reset them but it won't allow them to reset because there is a check engine light assc with these codes stating the speed sensor is not even there at all. So I changed the RF speed sensor just now...and still code, still problems. I am so tired of this. I just ordered the rear speed sensor will be here tuesday...
__________________
![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
#11 |
|
Super Member
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 525
Drives: 190D, C240, C43
|
You've used different tyre rolling diameters between the front and rear. That's causing the ABS to log a fault.....the transmission uses the ABS as a speed reference (both rear sensors) but it's now won't shift bacause the speed signal is wrong.........the engine light is on because the transmission ECU told the engine ECU to turn it on
![]() If you fit 245/35/20 on the front then they will be exactly the same rolling diameter......clear the codes, problem solved
|
|
|
|
|
|
#12 | |
|
Member
|
Quote:
__________________
![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#13 |
|
Super Member
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Covington wa
Posts: 869
Drives: 05 SL500, 02 BMW Z3 (Mrs. VF), 05 FJR1300, 91 ZX-11
|
Agree with AusMbTech. The rolling diameters of the front and rear tires are too far off. In non tech terms, your front tires are turning faster (more RPM)than the rears which your ABS computer interprets as a loss of traction. Because this continues for more than a few seconds your computer thinks something is wrong and tries to save you by throwing codes, lighting lights etc.
If 245 is too wide for the front, try a 235 front and 265 rear. |
|
|
|
|
|
#14 |
|
Member
|
yeah...the 245s wouldn't fit unless I use a hubcentric spacer...so now I'm stuck with a useless set of tires?!?!?
__________________
![]() Last edited by howie; 04-26-2008 at 02:44 PM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#15 |
|
Member
|
__________________
![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
#16 |
|
MBWorld Fanatic!
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Seattle WA
Posts: 3,527
Drives: 99e320, 00e320, YSR-50, Kymco150, ZRX1200R
|
sorry you had to learn the hard way, Howie, but as the others have said, your
selection of tires was flawed. the rolling circumference differential between front and rear tires is waaay off....5 inches per revolution (!). velvet fog is spot on in his prognosis.
__________________
raymond- 47º34'N 122º18'W |
|
|
|
|
|
#17 |
|
MBWorld Fanatic!
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 4,434
Drives: E55 powered E320 Wagon,1971MGB Track/Rally, MG Midget Autocross,94subaru, 2000 E320 wagon.
|
Your rear
tires are a full 1/2 inch taller than the fronts and travel 15 fewer revs per mile. BTW who ever figured you could use a 10 inch rim with a 40et?
Bet your cruise control doesn't work either. If I am correct your oem tire size was a 245/40/17 on the rear so its diameter was 24.71 inches,your new rear tires are 26.73 inches in diameter that 2 inches difference in diameter equals 65 fewer revs per mile from your stock tires effectively changing your gear ratio to an 8 percent taller gear,throwing your speedometer way off and hurting overall performance off the line,and causing the havoc with all the sensors and warnings and transmission problems. So not only are they off in diameter front and rear causing problems,they are 2 inches greater in diameter then your oem tires and therein lies your greatest problem. Long story short all 4 tires need to go,ask Luke to match a set of 20's to stock diameter and then all you will have to worry about is the increased braking distance you will suffer. ohlord ![]() a 235/35/19 front and a 265/30/19 would have been the correct set up.Both within 20 revs per mile from stock and well within the acceptable margin of error of under 3 percent,but since that is a pricey mistake the best you can hope for now is to try and find the 20's that come close to oem diameter if you can
Last edited by ohlord; 04-28-2008 at 05:06 AM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#18 |
|
Member
|
^^^ thanks guys I can see all of your points. I was planning on doing 19s in the first place but I saw quite a few clks with 20 inch rims on cardomain so I figured I'd give it a shot. And like Ronald Reagan used to say - "Well..." now I'm stuck. I rather figure out the matching rear tire size to make it work. I can live with (like I have a choice) selling my barely used rear tires and getting another pair i.e 265/25...if that works!?! Will I have the same problem still because the diameters are so much bigger than OE diameters?
BTW my original front tire size was 245/35 but they hit the knuckle so the tire guy picked this drastic change of size. Otherwise I think I would have been OK ![]() let's just say I wouldn't recommend anyone try this at home...it's waaaaaaaaaaaaaaaay too close. The wheels are touching the body when the car is in the air. Not until the car is on the ground do they clear by a few hairs
__________________
![]() Last edited by howie; 04-28-2008 at 09:52 AM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#19 |
|
Super Member
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Covington wa
Posts: 869
Drives: 05 SL500, 02 BMW Z3 (Mrs. VF), 05 FJR1300, 91 ZX-11
|
There are two considerations when changing the rim/tire combo. 1 is making sure the front/rear tire diameters are close; 2 keeping the tire diameter close to stock. Going to a different tire diameter on all four corners won't confuse your ABS or throw codes, but your speedometer will be wrong.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#20 | |
|
Member
|
Quote:
__________________
![]() Last edited by howie; 04-28-2008 at 11:11 AM. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#21 |
|
MBWorld Fanatic!
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 4,434
Drives: E55 powered E320 Wagon,1971MGB Track/Rally, MG Midget Autocross,94subaru, 2000 E320 wagon.
|
PM'd you
265/30/20 is dead on diameter with the fronts.That is if you don't mind the speedometer being off by 6%.So that should solve the issues.All but the harsh ride quality,the increased braking distance and the speedometer accuracy and the dealer may be able to adjust that with the star machine.
![]() Funny how small a world it is Ray,velvet,and I all chiming in and all within 40 miles of eachother
Last edited by ohlord; 04-28-2008 at 11:11 AM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#22 | |
|
Member
|
Quote:
thanks to all the local techs guessing at the issues. I would have thrown hundreds of dollars at this problem to no avail!!!BTW I have a pair of good as new 285/35/20 tires for sale
__________________
![]() Last edited by howie; 04-28-2008 at 11:18 AM. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#23 |
|
MBWorld Fanatic!
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Seattle WA
Posts: 3,527
Drives: 99e320, 00e320, YSR-50, Kymco150, ZRX1200R
|
howie - for future ref....
tire/wheel fitment my favorite... http://www.miata.net/garage/tirecalc.html good one showing side fits... http://www.1010tires.com/WheelOffsetCalculator.asp another good one..for MBs, showing reasonable fitments... http://www.alloywheelsdirect.net/inf.../mercedes-benz
__________________
raymond- 47º34'N 122º18'W |
|
|
|
|
|
#24 |
|
Member
|
^^^^ thanks bro, but the problem with those tire fitment websites for me was that none of them recommended 20s for my car as an option and I just had to be "different."
those websites are crazy!!! Great info there based on the MB site I guess I should have done 235 35 & 265 30
__________________
![]() Last edited by howie; 04-29-2008 at 01:52 AM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#25 |
|
MBWorld Fanatic!
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Seattle WA
Posts: 3,527
Drives: 99e320, 00e320, YSR-50, Kymco150, ZRX1200R
|
you have a point....and I did as well: they calculate rolling distance, which
would have red flagged the problem between front and rear tires
__________________
raymond- 47º34'N 122º18'W |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|