![]() |
![]() |
|
|||||||
| Home | Register | Photo Gallery | FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Used Cars | Vendor Directory |
| CLK55 AMG, CLK63 AMG (W208, W209) Discuss the past, present and future CLK55 AMG and the CLK63 AMG. |
| Welcome to MBWorld.org! |
|
|
Welcome to MBWorld, You are currently viewing our forum as a guest, which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our community, at no cost, you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is free, fast and simple, so please join our community today! |
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
#1 | |||
|
Newbie
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: San Diego
Posts: 20
Drives: 996 Turbo, ML320
|
Cabriolet
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Junior Member
Join Date: Jan 2002
Posts: 74
Drives: '02 CLK 55 cabrio (sold), '03 C32 (sold), '04 R32 (sold), '04 911/X-51 (keeper)
|
cab
Not sure if this helps...but my 208 55 cab stickered at 82k w/o command, but I was able to get close to $5k off. Bought in January in Sioux Falls, SD off of Ebay from the MBZ dealer there. I was waitlisted at my local dealer for the new e55, and was intending to do a trade in, but while waiting drove an 03 C32, and decided to buy that one instead, and kept the 55 cab. The c32 gave me 95% of the e55 performance, and I still have the cab to enjoy on sunny days! My cab just turned over 20k miles; took my 10 year old daughter on a 1,800 mile, ten day road trip and we never put the top up. The c32 is one heck of a car, too.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
MBWorld Fanatic!
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: WOT somewhere in the Bay Area
Posts: 3,438
Drives: '10 E63 soon, '09 C63, '09 Denali, 08 Range Rover, '08 ZO6, '07 Rubicon
|
3.5 and 4.5 years old AND boster seats? Go with the E class. Aside from being a huge difference in performance, your back will thank you later! I have both a 210 and a 208 cab as well as 2 kids (11 and 14). I'm 6'03" which makes the seat behind me useless. My wife drives the cab as a secondary car and the only time we take it on a trip is if the wife and I are going alone. The kids hate the back seat. Getting kids buckled in and out of the back is going to be a nightmare.
Either way, go with the charcoal interior. The kids will make a mess of the ash. |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Super Member
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: West Chester, PA
Posts: 629
Drives: All of the above
|
E55 vs. CLK55 cab?
Decisions, decisions.
First of all: Base price of 2004 CLK55 cab = base, $79,500 + $720 D&D + $1,300 gas guzzler = $81,520 Base price of E55 = $76,000 + $720 D&D + $1700 = $78,420 If performance is your priority then the E55 provides much more HP for less $. If a convertible is a priority then the CLK55 is the fastest MB Cab. made and is no slouch with 362 HP (although it gives up 100HP to the E55) 2 doors, plenty of performance and a drop top VS. 4 doors and over the top performance I personally like performance over style (E55) If style and "convertibleness" are important than the CLK55 is the one. 2 very different animals, you can't go wrong either way. P.S. I see so many people buy cabs that are not really "convertible people". If you are going to buy the cab and then drive around with the top up and the A/C blowing all summer do us a favor and get the E. There's nothing that irks me more than seeing a beautiful cab/conv. on a beautiful day with the top up. Has your wife had a conv. before? Will she be OK with her hair being "messed up". If not don't waste the 10K on a cab that will not get used. (Sorry, one of my peaves, nothing personal)
__________________
never put off till tomorrow if you can: ride/drive/fly/dance/sing today! 1991 300CE Cabernet / Palamino (the last true "E class coupe") 2003 Yamaha FJR1300 1994 Ducati 900SuperSport 1982 Suzuki GS1100E 1988 Ford Econoline E250 w/ hydraulic lift for the bikes (track van) |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Member
Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 77
|
I agree. When I bought my 430 cab I thought I would use it all the time. But with the midwest weather, lots of highway driving, etc., I don't drive with the top down nearly as much as I thought i would. And, if you or your wife are a "hate squeaks and rattles" person, don't get the cab. Even though its an MB, the diminished structural rigidity of the cab makes them unavoidable. I was surprised at how many mine had. That's one of the reasons why I'm getting rid of my cab for the E55.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Newbie
Join Date: Aug 2003
Posts: 26
Drives: Clk 55 AMG Cabriolet
|
hey this is my first post. i think the E55 AMG has more bang for your bucks but the CLK55 AMG has more street cred-and who can not love the wind in your hair. cant you get childrens seats ?????? as an opion?
__________________
1.2004-CLK 55 AMG Cabriolet (on order) 2.C 32 K AMG(wife) 3.2001 E430(until my CLK/SL arrives) 4.2003 E55AMG (sold)
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Newbie
Join Date: Aug 2003
Posts: 26
Drives: Clk 55 AMG Cabriolet
|
as an option** sorry
__________________
1.2004-CLK 55 AMG Cabriolet (on order) 2.C 32 K AMG(wife) 3.2001 E430(until my CLK/SL arrives) 4.2003 E55AMG (sold)
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|