![]() |
![]() |
|
|||||||
| Home | Register | Photo Gallery | FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Used Cars | Vendor Directory |
| CLK55 AMG, CLK63 AMG (W208, W209) Discuss the past, present and future CLK55 AMG and the CLK63 AMG. |
| Welcome to MBWorld.org! |
|
|
Welcome to MBWorld, You are currently viewing our forum as a guest, which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our community, at no cost, you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is free, fast and simple, so please join our community today! |
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
#1 | |||
|
Senior Member
|
What will be your next car ?
__________________
2002 CLK55 ///AMG Brilliant Silver/Int Charcoal Timeport, Voice Activation & GPS Command System, K&N V1 Hardwired - 18" MILLE' Miglia EV- Wheels-Kuhmos Tires (R 8.5 fr/10.0 rear) - 20mm H&R Wheel Spacers (Wifes Car) 2004 Porsche Targa - THERE IS NO OTHER ! JUST BRING IT ! |
|||
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
MBWorld Fanatic!
Join Date: Aug 2002
Posts: 1,103
Drives: 2007 ML350 Sport
|
FYI
The C4S is a pig, according to Porsche dealers and true Porsche fans. It has the same 3.6 liter engine as the base 996 and weighs 400lbs pounds more. Yeah you gat all wheel drive! But no engine improvements (horse Power) to help pull that added weight. The do look nice, just wanted to point out its major flaw. Tim |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Senior Member
|
C4S is not the fastest, and that's ok
Agreed, Timster, but Speed is not my main concern, (CLK55 5.0 0 - 60 - 986 C4S 0-60 - 5.2) Functionality, Style and handling outweighs the speed aspect. I live in a very snow belt location, winter is a b!tch here. But you point is duly noted my ///AMG brother
...
__________________
2002 CLK55 ///AMG Brilliant Silver/Int Charcoal Timeport, Voice Activation & GPS Command System, K&N V1 Hardwired - 18" MILLE' Miglia EV- Wheels-Kuhmos Tires (R 8.5 fr/10.0 rear) - 20mm H&R Wheel Spacers (Wifes Car) 2004 Porsche Targa - THERE IS NO OTHER ! JUST BRING IT ! |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
MBWorld Fanatic!
Join Date: Aug 2002
Posts: 1,103
Drives: 2007 ML350 Sport
|
I get confused! LOL
The C4S is a good looking car. My 01 996 Twin Turbo was a great looking car, but I was really disappointed in it's performance. But I was looking for a Race Car right out of the box and the car just didn't perform. If I wanted to put another $20-30K into it would have been an awesome car. But I didn't want to go the added expense on a car that was already over $100K. Have fun with what ever you decide on, Tim |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Super Member
Join Date: Nov 2001
Posts: 777
Drives: 2005 SL65
|
last time i visited a porsche dealer, i was told the AWD wasn't meant to make the car a snow-belter and shouldn't cause a driver to feel abundant confidence in bad weather.
remember, AWD aside, the car rides on high-performance tires. and those tires, regardless of sales materials, truly are fair-weather friends. |
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Denver
Posts: 422
Drives: 2003 E55 President's Edition
|
Timster it sounds like you need the New GT3...I think it ould sufice your desire.
Eric Current www.968S.com... ...next up CLK55 |
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Newbie
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Chicago
Posts: 12
Drives: 997 C2S Cab
|
"The C4S is a pig, according to Porsche dealers and true Porsche fans."
As an owner I would disagree. I guess it depends which dealers you talk to and which "true" Porsche fans those happen to be. You might also want to check out times at Nurburgring where the C4S is faster than the C2 and M3. Some C2 owners don't like the heavier feel of the steering, but most C4 and C4S owners prefer it. I guess they also put awd on the Turbo for a reason. The C4S comes with the Turbo's brakes, stiffer sports suspension, and bigger wheels 18" but also 295/30 rears as opposed to 17" and 265/35. You also get PSM as standard should you really screw up a corner. If you live in an area that gets lots of bad weather I wouldn't hesitate to get a C4S over a C2, and many "true" Porsche fans seem to agree. |
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Super Member
Join Date: Nov 2001
Posts: 777
Drives: 2005 SL65
|
i'd prefer a C4S no matter the prevailing conditions.
however, one shouldn't mistake porsche AWD, cayenne notwithstanding, for a foul-weather solution, but rather a palliative. i'd trade my 2002 208 (55) for a 209 CLK 4-MATIC the moment it's released, assuming i'm confident the bugs are worked out. |
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Almost a Member!
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 62
Drives: 2001 CL500
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Super Member
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: vancouver
Posts: 912
|
timster, just outta curiosity how was the turbo disapponiting..
its faster than c2 c4 c4s....even a clk 55... so what was the problem with that ride?
__________________
Merry X'mas and a Happy New Year |
|
|
|
|
|
#11 |
|
Almost a Member!
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: new jersey
Posts: 70
Drives: currently c240
|
i'm probulary going to get rid of the c32 amg [again] and let my wife take the the clk, and my whole life my dream car was a porsche 911 turbo. hopefully, if not that, a 911 targa. if not that, for sure, e55 amg.
__________________
03' laguna seca e46 m3 [gone] 02' black c32 amg rain sensors, nav, dvd, 3 tv's total(gone) 2003 CLK55 AMG, Capri blue, charcoal nappa leather,bi xenon lights, navigation,keyless go ( totaled 6/31/03 ) 2003 c240 stock |
|
|
|
|
|
#12 |
|
Member
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: SoCal
Posts: 214
Drives: '03 CLK500 (gone), '99 E320 (gone), '04 325i (wife), '04 911 40th Anniv
|
I'm with you. The 911 turbo is my dream car. The 911 C4S is a close runner up though. It's got the same wide body as the turbo.
Another option instead of the 911 turbo is the Ferrari 360 Modena. I saw a 2001 for $124,000. This is truely a work of art. ...please don't wake me up...I'm still dreaming. |
|
|
|
|
|
#13 | |
|
MBWorld Fanatic!
Join Date: Aug 2002
Posts: 1,103
Drives: 2007 ML350 Sport
|
Quote:
It took me a long time before I could afford one. When I finally got it, I was floating on air. Mine was a 2001 996 Twin Turbo, all wheel drive, tiptronic, Artic Silver. It was a beautiful car. ( It had 2600 miles on it) Unfortunately the car was very disappointing. A corvette Z06 will beat it in every category. I ran it against a 2002 Z06 (Completely stock) from 50mph to 130mph. The Z06 passed me like I was standing still. I also took the car and raced it in open road racing. At a 130MPH the car bounced like a basket ball. Very unnerving when you don’t feel you have control of the car. During the race I was running at 140MPH came to a crest of a hill, a gust of wind picked up the car and moved us 2 feet over. Very scary! It was very weird the car was smooth as silk at 160mph but at 130mph it bounced around allot. Yes I had the tires load balanced, and the alignment and suspension checked. The car is built for people with smaller frames. I called it my ¾ car. The steering wheel, shift knob, and gauges, where all just about ¾ the size of most cars. On long drives two hours or more, I had to get out of the car it made me very sore, back legs, arms. The driving position for me was very uncomfortable, it does not have a tilt wheel. It had a telescopic wheel, but it only moved about 1 inch not enough for me. For some people this will be the perfect car it just wasn’t right for me. I am glade I bought it, it was something I just had to do. Cheers, Tim |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#14 |
|
Almost a Member!
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: new jersey
Posts: 70
Drives: currently c240
|
to be honest, I didnt like Porsches that much. Back in my younger days, i did parking in NYC and some guy came to a wedding in some fancy place, but he told me he was in no rush so take it around the block once, so we went and it was just simply.....unbelievable. After that, a 911 turbo was my dream car.
__________________
03' laguna seca e46 m3 [gone] 02' black c32 amg rain sensors, nav, dvd, 3 tv's total(gone) 2003 CLK55 AMG, Capri blue, charcoal nappa leather,bi xenon lights, navigation,keyless go ( totaled 6/31/03 ) 2003 c240 stock |
|
|
|
|
|
#15 |
|
Member
|
4 **** SAKE!!
WAIT A YEAR AND BUY THE NEW M5 WITH 20" Standard rims and a OUTRAGEOUS V10 engine with 500 hp.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#16 |
|
Newbie
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Chicago
Posts: 12
Drives: 997 C2S Cab
|
Doesn't sound like a TT at all!
My experience with the TT (and my own C4S) is that the suspension is supple, tracks beautifully and doesn't move around in the way you describe it. Did you have standard setup (wheels, tires, suspension) on the car or was it modded? Did you ever get it aligned and corner balanced?
As to the driving position it took me a while to get used to a more upright seating position, but as I'm only 5' 10" I'm not affected maybe in the way you were. |
|
|
|
|
|
#17 |
|
MBWorld Fanatic!
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Florida
Posts: 2,065
Drives: 2002 CLK 55 AMG Coupe ;)
|
My dream car?
CL, next generation, perhaps? ...with extended warranty I have till 10/2008 to decide, while enjoying my CLK55 everytime I take it on the road.
__________________
2002 CLK55 ////AMG brilliant silver & charcoal nappa GPS Comand & Escort 8500 |
|
|
|
|
|
#18 |
|
Newbie
|
Porsche GT3, Porsche TT, or Mercedes SL55 AMG
Handling is key
__________________
Pistol |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|