![]() |
![]() |
|
|||||||
| Home | Register | Photo Gallery | FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Used Cars | Vendor Directory |
| CLK55 AMG, CLK63 AMG (W208, W209) Discuss the past, present and future CLK55 AMG and the CLK63 AMG. |
| Welcome to MBWorld.org! |
|
|
Welcome to MBWorld, You are currently viewing our forum as a guest, which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our community, at no cost, you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is free, fast and simple, so please join our community today! |
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
#1 | |||
|
Almost a Member!
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Portland, OR
Posts: 41
Drives: W209 CLK55 AMG, 89' E300
|
CLK55 AMG(W209) specs
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
MBWorld Fanatic!
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Connecticut
Posts: 7,188
Drives: 2003 CLK55
|
They had the full specs of the 2004 CLK55 in Car and Driver a couple of months ago. When I go home tonight I will try and look it up. Unfortuanetly I don't have a scanner.
I'll post the info tomorrow. What I would like to know is how many 2003 CLK55's were made for the United States??
__________________
1999 CLK430 Black/Black(Gone) 1999 ML430 Black Opal 2003 CLK55 Black/Black
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Almost a Member!
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Portland, OR
Posts: 41
Drives: W209 CLK55 AMG, 89' E300
|
CLK55's built
im not quite sure how many exactly were sold in the US but i know that every MB dealership in the country got only 1 W209 CLK55 AMG. im not sure if that means they replace the ones sold or not but i know that it is one of the more rare AMG's. My dad for example owns a 2003 CLK55 AMG and we live in Oregon but we got it from Ohio and weve seen only 2 others in Oregon and im not quite sure but we should have around that many MB dealerships around here. btw Auto week gave the 2003 CLK55's a .83 g's for the skidpad rating and road and track gave the 2001 clk55's a .91 so thats why i am curious to know the specs
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
MBWorld Fanatic!
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Connecticut
Posts: 7,188
Drives: 2003 CLK55
|
This is from the May 2004 issue of Car and Driver where they compared the 2004 CLK55 against the BMW 645ci, and the Maserati cuope cambiocorsa. The CLK55 came in first place by the way!
This is fir the 2004 CLK55....sorry , don't have a scanner. length: 182.6 width: 68.5 height: 55.4 wheelbase: 106.9 track, front/rear: 58.9/58.0 weight, pounds: 3740 weight dist % front/rear: 54.5/45.5 feul tank, gallons: 16.4 interior volume, front: 48 rear: 34 trunk: 10 engine type: SOHC 24-valve V-8 displacement, cc: 5439 power, bph @ rpm: 362 @ 5750 torque, lb-ft @ rpm: 376 @ 4000 redline: 6700 0-60mph: 4.5 0-100mph: 11.0 0-120mph: 16.3 1/4 mile @ mph: 13.1 @ 109 top speed: 155 (governed) braking, 70-0, feet: 158 roadholding, 300-foot skidpad, g: 0.87 lane change, mph: 71.4 How's that?
__________________
1999 CLK430 Black/Black(Gone) 1999 ML430 Black Opal 2003 CLK55 Black/Black
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Almost a Member!
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Portland, OR
Posts: 41
Drives: W209 CLK55 AMG, 89' E300
|
thanks a lot for the specs. i can't believe though that the clk handles only at .87g's. in road and track the old 2001 CLK55 amg got rated at .91. do u think if car and driver did the test that the old one would handle better than the w209?
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|