Go Back   MBWorld.org Forums > Mercedes-Benz AMG Vehicles > CLK55 AMG, CLK63 AMG (W208, W209) > CLK63 Black Series Forum & Registry

CLK63 Black Series Forum & Registry Information and discussion on the W209 CLK63 AMG Black Series and Registry for all owners.

Welcome to MBWorld.org!
Welcome to MBWorld,

You are currently viewing our forum as a guest, which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our community, at no cost, you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is free, fast and simple, so please join our community today!


Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Rate Thread Display Modes
Old 02-21-2008, 03:21 AM   #101
LZH
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
LZH's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 1,774
Drives: CLK 63 Black Series, B6 S4 Avant, 997S, , Lexus RXh, 2002 35' Cigarette, '04 GMC 3500 Duramax dually
Brad - Thx man. Sounds about like I thought it would. Really opened it up so much so that you can really hear the motor now - I dig it, alot.
Question though....how do you avert CEL and other associated probs with no cats ? Are you just looping 02 sensors?
Any plans to stake the stock cans and rework the insides or just remove baffeling ?
Thx -
To remove this ad, register today or login if you already are registered!

LZH is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-21-2008, 12:35 PM   #102
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
juicee63's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Hollywood CA
Posts: 6,220
Drives: 2007 CLS63 030
Send a message via Yahoo to juicee63
This thread just made me start sweating.

This is incredible stuff. You should go 315 in the rear 285 in front 305 is ok but you can easily get a 315 on an 11 inch rim, may as well go ballz to the wall, car will plant real nicely. i have a 305 cup on my 10" and its fine but if I had an 11" my goodness a 315 4 sure.

The roll cage is amazing , the wheels are a dream, the car is going to really move out with the weight reduction.

Did you guys weigh the car? what will the weight savings be or did the addition of the roll cage and headers etc mitigate the gains of the wheel's?

Jim, I will be more than happy to escort you around Hollywood if you wanna come down. I will check and see if anything is open so we can run FEB 27?

Great JOB EVOSPORT!!!!
__________________
juicee63 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-21-2008, 01:11 PM   #103
Administrator
 
otoupalik's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: SoCal
Posts: 2,395
Drives: evosport's
Quote:
Originally Posted by jrcart View Post
She doesn't want to hook up does she? I'm going to go broke paying for tires!
Nope.

Quote:
Originally Posted by MACHC5 View Post
I don't know... maybe it's just me, but...

I can't tell if it sounds any different by the video.
I can't tell if it's any faster by the video.
I don't see the new Dymags either.


It's a premature emasculation...
If you cannot hear any difference, you need better speakers on your PC!

I think anyone near Huntington Beach yesterday HEARD the difference!

Quote:
Originally Posted by LZH View Post
Brad - Thx man. Sounds about like I thought it would. Really opened it up so much so that you can really hear the motor now - I dig it, alot.
Question though....how do you avert CEL and other associated probs with no cats ? Are you just looping 02 sensors?
Any plans to stake the stock cans and rework the insides or just remove baffeling ?
Thx -
Oh yea, we are adding resonators now to deal with the little off throttle rasp. You can HEAR the motor for sure. It sounds really amazing. If anyone has been to an F1 race, it now sounds like the MBZ safety cars now! So cool!

CEL - good engineering and a good software partner!

Stock mufflers - we could, but I think everything would be better served with a different muffler. Even the OE tips could be re-used. We will see once the resonators get on.

Quote:
Originally Posted by juicee63 View Post
This thread just made me start sweating.

This is incredible stuff. You should go 315 in the rear 285 in front 305 is ok but you can easily get a 315 on an 11 inch rim, may as well go ballz to the wall, car will plant real nicely. i have a 305 cup on my 10" and its fine but if I had an 11" my goodness a 315 4 sure.

The roll cage is amazing , the wheels are a dream, the car is going to really move out with the weight reduction.

Did you guys weigh the car? what will the weight savings be or did the addition of the roll cage and headers etc mitigate the gains of the wheel's?

Jim, I will be more than happy to escort you around Hollywood if you wanna come down. I will check and see if anything is open so we can run FEB 27?

Great JOB EVOSPORT!!!!
Thanks for the nice words.

There is no way to lower the car to a proper ride height and fit those tire sizes in a DOT-R tire (remember for those not used to DOT-R, DOT-R tires are wider the standard street tires. So a 305 DOT-R will really be about the same as a standard 315).

We did a lot of test fitting and with the clearances that we have there is not going to be any way to go 285 front and 315 rear. At stock ride height yes, but there is much to be gained in handling by dropping the roll center, and that is a bigger gain then a bit more tire.

Thanks again for the great praise!

thanks
brad
__________________
otoupalik is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-21-2008, 01:24 PM   #104
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
jrcart's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Naperville, IL/Chicago
Posts: 2,963
Drives: 08 Evosport CLK 63 Blk Series
Quote:
Originally Posted by juicee63 View Post
This thread just made me start sweating.

This is incredible stuff. You should go 315 in the rear 285 in front 305 is ok but you can easily get a 315 on an 11 inch rim, may as well go ballz to the wall, car will plant real nicely. i have a 305 cup on my 10" and its fine but if I had an 11" my goodness a 315 4 sure.

The roll cage is amazing , the wheels are a dream, the car is going to really move out with the weight reduction.

Did you guys weigh the car? what will the weight savings be or did the addition of the roll cage and headers etc mitigate the gains of the wheel's?

Jim, I will be more than happy to escort you around Hollywood if you wanna come down. I will check and see if anything is open so we can run FEB 27?

Great JOB EVOSPORT!!!!

Juicee63; I may take you up on that offer. I am coming out there with one of my best friends, we are going to party it up Hollywood style for a couple nights before driving to Vegas. We have a very good friend that is Director of Legal Affairs for Playboy, so he usually has some insane hook-ups.

As for the tires, I don't think 315's will fit. Evosport and an I believe engineer or rep from Dymag took all kinds of measurments on the car trying to maximize my contact patch and 305 was the largest they said I could go. Keep in mind they lowered the ride height adjustment and we are running much shorter springs than stock, I think I am rolling at least a inch lower than stock. This car will be driven and driven hard, I can't afford to have ANY tire clearence issues. I do believe they are trying to go 285 up front, it's going to be close, have not heard a verdict on that yet.
jrcart is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-21-2008, 01:30 PM   #105
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
jrcart's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Naperville, IL/Chicago
Posts: 2,963
Drives: 08 Evosport CLK 63 Blk Series
I guess Brad answered those same question while I was typing my last post.
jrcart is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-21-2008, 03:15 PM   #106
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
juicee63's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Hollywood CA
Posts: 6,220
Drives: 2007 CLS63 030
Send a message via Yahoo to juicee63
Quote:
Originally Posted by jrcart View Post
I guess Brad answered those same question while I was typing my last post.
I will PM you so you can call maybe we can grab a drink !

Man I am so Jealous, sure would be awesome if the 1000 hp SL and the 750 hp SL were done around the same time,

I see about the tires, 305 will be plenty , cannot wait to see this, I may just take a cruise down and make sure its ok, LOL
__________________
juicee63 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-21-2008, 03:25 PM   #107
Out Of Control!
 
JamE55's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: CA, NV, CO
Posts: 19,916
Quote:
Originally Posted by otoupalik View Post
I think anyone near Huntington Beach yesterday HEARD the difference!
I'm over here in torrance and i heard it. LOL Now post some Real vids and forget the teaser stuff.
__________________
CLK-DTM AMG...The only one you'll need for the street!

Reliable Tuning Companies Below:
www.Evosport.com Buy now or die!
www.EuroteckMotorsports.com Buy now or die!!
www.ttmotorsports.com If you want to hear the voice of God! :D
What Kleemann does to mere mortals --->
JamE55 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-22-2008, 03:00 PM   #108
Administrator
 
otoupalik's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: SoCal
Posts: 2,395
Drives: evosport's
Some updates.

Exhaust:
- We did add our high performance resonators, the rasp and harshness is gone. it sounds amazing!

Dyno:
- We have finished the first night/round of tuning. Pretty happy with the results so far! +56 RWHP and +47 RWT for the header, exhaust and software (of course done with our tuning partner Powerchip)!


Here is a quick vid on the rollers:


Aero:
We have completed the front and the rear bits (with big thanks to our aero partner Vorsteiner who came through once again by accomplishing the impossible with far less time then reasonable):




* You can click on the images for more pics *





* You can click on the images for more pics *

The Carbon weave on the front and rear matches OE almost perfect. These are pre-clear coat, which is happening now. It is really hard to see the CF on the rear due to the lighting, but it is full CF.

More to come........

Thanks
Brad
__________________
otoupalik is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-22-2008, 03:43 PM   #109
spr
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Posts: 1,302
Very impressive results and nice front lip. I think the rear is a bit much however-
__________________
2005 C55 with a couple of mods.
spr is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-22-2008, 05:02 PM   #110
LZH
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
LZH's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 1,774
Drives: CLK 63 Black Series, B6 S4 Avant, 997S, , Lexus RXh, 2002 35' Cigarette, '04 GMC 3500 Duramax dually
YIKES !!!! That sound is pretty sick man. Love the front air dam, but I also feel the rear tail is a bit much but looks trick nonetheless. Brad, wat is the lead time on that front air dam and headers ? I think I might next in line !!!
LZH is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-22-2008, 05:19 PM   #111
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 175
Drives: 2008 CLK 63 Black Series, 2003 G500
I think your math (or typing) is faulty on the horsepower increase. It looks to be a 56 RWHP increase, not 66.
ET550 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-22-2008, 05:22 PM   #112
Administrator
 
otoupalik's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: SoCal
Posts: 2,395
Drives: evosport's
fixed.
__________________
otoupalik is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-22-2008, 05:30 PM   #113
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
jrcart's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Naperville, IL/Chicago
Posts: 2,963
Drives: 08 Evosport CLK 63 Blk Series
Quote:
Originally Posted by spr View Post
Very impressive results and nice front lip. I think the rear is a bit much however-
Believe me, I'm not a fan of big wings. Aero was one of the first discussions I had with the guys at Evosport, and I told them I absolutely hate big wings, but this car needs downforce. Why do you think they put that big wing on the DTM car? The stock lip is a joke! This was done 100% for function. I'm no aero engineer, but I don't think I could do one without the other (front vs back). I had the choice of the Europe only M-B OEM (DTM style) wing or this one. In my opinion this is far more attractive and unique, while still maintaining a close to factory look, so I went this route. Besides, I actually like it now that I see it and it turned out better than expected.
jrcart is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-22-2008, 05:46 PM   #114
LZH
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
LZH's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 1,774
Drives: CLK 63 Black Series, B6 S4 Avant, 997S, , Lexus RXh, 2002 35' Cigarette, '04 GMC 3500 Duramax dually
Quote:
Originally Posted by jrcart View Post
Believe me, I'm not a fan of big wings. Aero was one of the first discussions I had with the guys at Evosport, and I told them I absolutely hate big wings, but this car needs downforce. Why do you think they put that big wing on the DTM car? The stock lip is a joke! This was done 100% for function. I'm no aero engineer, but I don't think I could do one without the other (front vs back). I had the choice of the Europe only M-B OEM (DTM style) wing or this one. In my opinion this is far more attractive and unique, while still maintaining a close to factory look, so I went this route. Besides, I actually like it now that I see it and it turned out better than expected.
I totally agree, and the DTM wing would be a bit much for the street. But, how was this Evosport wing developed ?? Was a windtunnel used to see exactly how it will react at speed or did you guys just make it bigger than the factory wing ??
LZH is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-22-2008, 05:49 PM   #115
Administrator
 
otoupalik's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: SoCal
Posts: 2,395
Drives: evosport's
lol - no windtunnel used. But, realize we run one of the most successful BMW racing programs around. We have extensive real world and track testing with many different aero mods.

That aside, it is pretty simple. Bigger lip, bigger splitter = more downforce. We will not now the aero balance till it is on track, and that will vary depending on each track.

Net/net - this is a functional and stylish update.

thanks
Brad
__________________
otoupalik is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-22-2008, 06:12 PM   #116
LZH
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
LZH's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 1,774
Drives: CLK 63 Black Series, B6 S4 Avant, 997S, , Lexus RXh, 2002 35' Cigarette, '04 GMC 3500 Duramax dually
Quote:
Originally Posted by otoupalik View Post
lol - no windtunnel used. But, realize we run one of the most successful BMW racing programs around. We have extensive real world and track testing with many different aero mods.

That aside, it is pretty simple. Bigger lip, bigger splitter = more downforce. We will not now the aero balance till it is on track, and that will vary depending on each track.

Net/net - this is a functional and stylish update.

thanks
Brad
Agreed...however, this says alot
Quote:
Originally Posted by otoupalik View Post
We will not now the aero balance till it is on track, and that will vary depending on each track.
Point I'm making is that AMG has a pretty successful racing program, too. So much so that they know exactly how the smallest aero change will affect the car at any given speed....Saying bigger lip, bigger splitter=more downforce is true, yet hardly technical. Don't get me wrong, I think the car looks stunning....just saying that there are alot of unknowns with the changes that have been made aerodynamically and this car is going to be quite a handfull with the FIXED (read not adjustable) aero you guys have added. The one thing I love about the Black Series is how neutral the handling is. With the aero changes you have made, well, you really won't know how the handling has changed until it actually happens....in other words, the changes have yet to be proven in the real world as AMG did when they developed the car.

Lastly, to really get this thing dialed in it's going to require a professional driver on a closed course and plenty of trackside support, lots of datalogging, spring changes, alignment changes, swaybars, compression and rebound damping adjustments, etc...

Last edited by LZH; 02-22-2008 at 06:25 PM.
LZH is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-22-2008, 07:01 PM   #117
PREMIER SPONSOR
 
Simon @ evosport's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Posts: 318
More pictures of the Aero Package. The carbon is exact same weave as the factory carbon. And the pictures really don't do these items justice. We are very excited and happy with the results and Vorsteiner did an amazing job with these items...















__________________
Simon | evosport
Mercedes-Benz :: BMW :: Porsche :: Ferrari
www.evosport.com
simon@evosport.com

Tel: 888-520-9971 | 714-901-3100
Fax: 714-242-1893
Simon @ evosport is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-22-2008, 07:31 PM   #118
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
BMWEATR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: strip bar in Oregon
Posts: 1,687
Drives: 211 E55(sold) & 80cc shifter kart
rear wing isn't to bad looking, looks better than stock. and since this car will be tracked it is totally necessary(sp?) any way great job evo sport!! this car rocks and i wish I had a chance to put it to the test on the track!!
__________________
NOTKTSINMYDBS
BMWEATR is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-22-2008, 07:42 PM   #119
Super Member
 
MACHC5's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Central New Jersey
Posts: 668
Drives: CLK63 Black, C55, 600E, Supercharged Denali & EVO MR
I think I like the Carbon Bits that are added...

Simon, is the front splitter an appliqué... over top of the factory splitter.?

I'd love to add HP but in N.J. at MV inspection time they plug into the ECU's OB wan port, young Jedi.

They would slap a Red Fail sticker right after hooking up to look for any tampering and ECU codes.
MACHC5 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-22-2008, 08:47 PM   #120
LZH
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
LZH's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 1,774
Drives: CLK 63 Black Series, B6 S4 Avant, 997S, , Lexus RXh, 2002 35' Cigarette, '04 GMC 3500 Duramax dually
Quote:
Originally Posted by MACHC5 View Post

I'd love to add HP but in N.J. at MV inspection time they plug into the ECU's OB wan port, young Jedi.

They would slap a Red Fail sticker right after hooking up to look for any tampering and ECU codes.
HUH ???? Are you telling me the NJ dept of motor vehicles has diagonstic equipment and the associated techs with enough knowledge to see if your stock ECU has been retuned ??? I find that very hard to believe. Most likely what they are doing is looking at OBD II data for emissions and any related codes being thrown...
LZH is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-22-2008, 08:48 PM   #121
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 228
sounds insane
TECHNICIAN is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-22-2008, 09:04 PM   #122
Super Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Posts: 553
Drives: C43, SLK32, CLK63 Black Series
I very much doubt that. The fuel curves and timing are modified but that would be undetectable by any equipment they have. It is still the stock ECU. They would need to have reference fuel curves and compare which there is no way the will do.

Quote:
Originally Posted by MACHC5 View Post

I'd love to add HP but in N.J. at MV inspection time they plug into the ECU's OB wan port, young Jedi.

They would slap a Red Fail sticker right after hooking up to look for any tampering and ECU codes.
SteveL is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-22-2008, 09:50 PM   #123
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
BMWEATR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: strip bar in Oregon
Posts: 1,687
Drives: 211 E55(sold) & 80cc shifter kart
Quote:
Originally Posted by MACHC5 View Post
I think I like the Carbon Bits that are added...

Simon, is the front splitter an appliqué... over top of the factory splitter.?

I'd love to add HP but in N.J. at MV inspection time they plug into the ECU's OB wan port, young Jedi.

They would slap a Red Fail sticker right after hooking up to look for any tampering and ECU codes.
no way than can tell. BUT! they will sure notice the exhaust issues!!!!!
__________________
NOTKTSINMYDBS
BMWEATR is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-22-2008, 10:08 PM   #124
LZH
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
LZH's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 1,774
Drives: CLK 63 Black Series, B6 S4 Avant, 997S, , Lexus RXh, 2002 35' Cigarette, '04 GMC 3500 Duramax dually
One other thing....as low as this car is going to be....and it's pretty damn low in stock form. Jcart has said it will be driven on the road mostly, that front splitter is going to get beat up badly without some sort of heavy duty ABS protector under it similar to whats available on the F430.
LZH is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-22-2008, 10:51 PM   #125
Super Member
 
MACHC5's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Central New Jersey
Posts: 668
Drives: CLK63 Black, C55, 600E, Supercharged Denali & EVO MR
Quote:
Originally Posted by LZH View Post
HUH ???? Are you telling me the NJ dept of motor vehicles has diagonstic equipment and the associated techs with enough knowledge to see if your stock ECU has been retuned ??? I find that very hard to believe. Most likely what they are doing is looking at OBD II data for emissions and any related codes being thrown...
I found out from my 2005 EVO what they can tell about the stock ECU's.

There is a check sum that the stock ECU's have and when it's modified the check sum changes.

The end result is they don't have to know what changed... they just know it was changed from a listed sum.
MACHC5 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Tags
amg, black, cage, clip, clk, clk63, diffuser, evo, evosport, front, project, rear, roll, series, sport


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:42 AM.


Advertise on MBWorld.org - Terms of Service - Privacy Policy - Jobs
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.3.0
Copyright © 2001-2008 InternetBrands, Inc. / MBWorld.org. All Rights Reserved.