R63 vs ML63 - Page 2

CynCarvin32 · 01-26-2007, 05:18 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by slk320

And why this guy even thinks we believe anything he says is beyond me.

As ANYONE ever seen a single picture of ANY of this clowns cars? No....

Mr. ClayJ has everything including 2 bugatti's... uh hu

To remove this ad, register today or login if you already are registered!

P4MER · 02-11-2007, 01:06 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ClayJ

I am doing the ML63, the R63, and the GL63....

I will post what I think of each as I take delivery.

Yea right !!!http://forums.mbworld.org/forums/ima...lies/crazy.gif

P4MER · 02-11-2007, 01:07 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ClayJ

I am doing the ML63, the R63, and the GL63....

I will post what I think of each as I take delivery.

Yea right !!

groupB · 04-18-2007, 11:43 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Germancar1

I can't see that, the R is bigger and heavier than the ML so the ML63 should be faster. The R63 is likely going to be the first AMG product to ever outright flop around on the market. I can't see much demand for it consider the sluggish sales of the R350/500.

M

Gotta agree. MB missed the Minivan parade in the mid 90's.

CLKFREAK · 04-21-2007, 12:34 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by FlyByNight

It will be really cool to have 4 wheel drive attached to an AMG engine, finally.

Agree with that. I like the R because of the amount of people it can carry.

Quote:

Originally Posted by K_Sport Driver

well, really it's just a Chrysler Pacifica made even uglier than thought possible

I wish my pacifica had 500hp..heck even 300 would be nice.

MercPlease · 04-24-2007, 10:32 PM

I'd take the ML63 over the R63 in a race.

AMGTestDriverNJ · 12-21-2007, 08:04 PM

Blue Monster, both your cars are dead serious. Nice work. I had no idea this R wagon was 4matc? I feel like that really makes it something worth looking into, not now, but later on when they have tanked to a price that reflects what it is truly worth. I don't need anything that big at the moment anyway. Is it true that all R AMGs are AWD?

princemarko · 05-10-2009, 05:35 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MercPlease

I'd take the ML63 over the R63 in a race.

The R63 is only .1 second slower than the ML63. One extra mod and you are past the ML.

kip · 05-11-2009, 01:47 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by princemarko

The R63 is only .1 second slower than the ML63. One extra mod and you are past the ML.

I love this mod talk... NOT.

One extra mod to the ML and you are past the R?!

04-24-2007, 10:32 PM	#31
MercPlease MBWorld Fanatic! Join Date: Apr 2007 Location: San Diego Posts: 2,587 Drives: C63 AMG, CLS55 AMG, Smart Cabrio, Fisker Karma, Chally SRT8	I'd take the ML63 over the R63 in a race. __________________

Thread Tools	Search this Thread
Show Printable Version Email this Page	Search this Thread: Advanced Search
Display Modes	Rate This Thread
Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Switch to Threaded Mode	Rate This Thread:

12-21-2007, 08:04 PM	#32
AMGTestDriverNJ MBWorld Fanatic! Join Date: Jul 2007 Location: Northern Bergen County, New Jersey Posts: 1,263 Drives: A Buncha Hot Crap	Blue Monster, both your cars are dead serious. Nice work. I had no idea this R wagon was 4matc? I feel like that really makes it something worth looking into, not now, but later on when they have tanked to a price that reflects what it is truly worth. I don't need anything that big at the moment anyway. Is it true that all R AMGs are AWD?

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)