C-Class (W203) 2001-2007, C160, C180, C200, C220, C230, C240, C270, C280, C300, C320, C230K, C350, Coupe

Is the manual wrong about oil capacity?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Rate Thread
 
Old 04-06-2007, 09:39 PM
  #1  
Super Member
Thread Starter
 
Pit-Pony's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Canada
Posts: 572
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
2015 C63S E1 (sold 2012 C63 AMG Sedan (Premium & APX)) & 09 C300 Sport 4Matic
Is the manual wrong about oil capacity?

My 05 C240 4Matic manual states 7.0l of oil (the non 4Matic is 7.8l). When I drain and fill with 7.0l and check it after a drive and rest it shows to add 1.0l. Using the trick to see the exact sump measurement it reads 6.0l in the sump ( I suppose the other liter is still in the engine and soaked in the filter).

What gives, does it really take more oil than the manual specifies?

..jack
Old 04-06-2007, 10:30 PM
  #2  
Super Member
 
BabyBenz6spd's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Illinois, Indiana
Posts: 810
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
2005 C230 Sedan 6spd
maybe you are confusing quarts with liters?
Attached Thumbnails Is the manual wrong about oil capacity?-c-class.bmp  
Old 04-07-2007, 12:03 AM
  #3  
Super Member
Thread Starter
 
Pit-Pony's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Canada
Posts: 572
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
2015 C63S E1 (sold 2012 C63 AMG Sedan (Premium & APX)) & 09 C300 Sport 4Matic
No confusion, using L in Canada. 7L just doesn't cut it as it asks for another L for a total of 8. Why?

..jack
Old 04-07-2007, 12:20 AM
  #4  
Member
 
c240classic's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 121
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
2007 cls63 AMG
I thought the c240's use 8.5l of oil. I am not sure that that manual you posted it right, might wanna check. Thanks
Old 04-07-2007, 08:18 AM
  #5  
Super Member
Thread Starter
 
Pit-Pony's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Canada
Posts: 572
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
2015 C63S E1 (sold 2012 C63 AMG Sedan (Premium & APX)) & 09 C300 Sport 4Matic
I obviously have the owners manual. The numbers are right but the car wants more.

..jack
Old 04-07-2007, 10:07 AM
  #6  
Junior Member
 
themerc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Denver, Colorado
Posts: 64
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
2006 M3 Coupe 6MT
When I look at the attached image in the earlier post, I see 7.5L (not 7.0L) for the C240.
I suspect that the warning device is designed to advise in 1.0L increments.
Maybe if you put 7.5L in at first, you won't see the warning.

Edit: Sorry, I was looking at the non 4-Matic number.
I see you have a 4-Matic, and the doc indeed shows 7.0L.
Still, maybe 7.5L would do the trick.

Last edited by themerc; 04-07-2007 at 10:10 AM.
Old 04-07-2007, 10:28 AM
  #7  
Admin Alumni
 
MB-BOB's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Posts: 8,143
Likes: 0
Received 18 Likes on 12 Posts
See Garage
The 2001 owner's manual I have for my 3.2L V6 says 8.5qts (8.0L) with filter replacement. Same for the C240 (no 4-matic that year). But the dealer has never been able to fit more than 8.0qts. (Any more and you get an MFD overfill warning). Since it's out of warranty now, I do my own oil changes, and when I put in 8.0qts, it measures out to 7.6 to 7.9qts.

So yes, I think the owner's manual capacity statements are inaccurate. Best to call your dealer service dept and ask them how much goes into your exact model and shoot for that.
Old 04-07-2007, 11:12 AM
  #8  
Member
 
c240classic's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 121
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
2007 cls63 AMG
My manual for my 2002 c240 says 8.5l, its a 2.6 v6. I just bought the mityvac 8.8 liter capacity top sump. I could have gotten a different brand for a lot less cheaper but it was 8 liter capacity and i was told i would have to empty it out before i could completely extract oil because it would overfill. If you search the forum, you will see that everybody puts in 8-8.5 l in their c240.Depends on how much they can extract out i guess. HTH.
Old 04-07-2007, 12:40 PM
  #9  
Super Member
Thread Starter
 
Pit-Pony's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Canada
Posts: 572
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
2015 C63S E1 (sold 2012 C63 AMG Sedan (Premium & APX)) & 09 C300 Sport 4Matic
Why would MB publish 7.0L for the C240 4Matic and when you do that it prompts for another 1.0L, ridiculous.

I ended up adding the remainder of another bottle (another 5/8L) for a total of slightly over 7.5L and it no longer complains. When I try the trick readout it now shows 6.8L in the sump after sitting overnight. I'd just hate to overfill it.

The dealer tech told me they always just add 8.0L to every C240 no matter which model.

Either the computer measurement is far from accurate or a good 1.0L remains in the engine and filter that never fully drains into the pan.

..jack
Old 04-07-2007, 01:07 PM
  #10  
Admin Alumni
 
MB-BOB's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Posts: 8,143
Likes: 0
Received 18 Likes on 12 Posts
See Garage
Originally Posted by Pit-Pony
I ended up adding the remainder of another bottle (another 5/8L) for a total of slightly over 7.5L and it no longer complains. When I try the trick readout it now shows 6.8L in the sump after sitting overnight. I'd just hate to overfill it.

Either the computer measurement is far from accurate or a good 1.0L remains in the engine and filter that never fully drains into the pan.

..jack
I agree there is no reason why a 2.6L V6 with 4-matic or without should have different oil capacities.

Originally Posted by Pit-Pony
The dealer tech told me they always just add 8.0L to every C240 no matter which model.
Your dealer comfirms what mine says (8.0L) then that is what I would add. I would do so in increments until you get the oil overfill display in the Multi function display. Then siphon off a bit until the display doesn't come back on. A PITA for sure, but better than leaving it 1L shy of full.

The computer measurement is quite accurate on my 3.2L. It reads 7.9 (qts) when left overnight. I put in 8 qts, so it's only .1 off.
Old 04-07-2007, 01:51 PM
  #11  
Super Member
 
wingless's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Rhode Island
Posts: 911
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Debadged 6-Speed '05 C320 Sports Coupe
Why not just use the distick tool and set the level to the maximum?
Old 04-07-2007, 03:39 PM
  #12  
Super Member
Thread Starter
 
Pit-Pony's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Canada
Posts: 572
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
2015 C63S E1 (sold 2012 C63 AMG Sedan (Premium & APX)) & 09 C300 Sport 4Matic
I think the oil pan is slightly smaller on the 4Matic due to the space needed for the front transfer case.

..jack
Old 04-09-2007, 12:34 AM
  #13  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
C230 Sport Coup's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: So. Oregon Coast
Posts: 6,791
Received 113 Likes on 103 Posts
C230 Sport Coup + 2006 W164 ML350 + 99 Ford Escort (What the heck, it gets 38 mpg!)
My computer reads a quart low in dyno mode.
Old 04-09-2007, 02:18 AM
  #14  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
pmb600's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 2,240
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
E550 4MATIC
Originally Posted by Pit-Pony
Using the trick to see the exact sump measurement it reads 6.0l in the sump
What is the trick to see the exact sump measurement?
Old 04-09-2007, 11:58 AM
  #15  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
C230 Sport Coup's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: So. Oregon Coast
Posts: 6,791
Received 113 Likes on 103 Posts
C230 Sport Coup + 2006 W164 ML350 + 99 Ford Escort (What the heck, it gets 38 mpg!)
Originally Posted by wingless
Why not just use the distick tool and set the level to the maximum?
120 bucks for a dipstick?

Looked it up at my fav benz dealer in florida, they have it for
75.
Old 04-09-2007, 01:40 PM
  #16  
Super Member
 
wingless's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Rhode Island
Posts: 911
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Debadged 6-Speed '05 C320 Sports Coupe
Originally Posted by wingless
Why not just use the distick tool and set the level to the maximum?
Originally Posted by C230 Sport Coup
120 bucks for a dipstick?

Looked it up at my fav benz dealer in florida, they have it for
75.
It is a disingenuous argument to object about the cost for an optional tool, when no objections were voiced about the savings realized from selecting this economy vehicle, instead of the higher quality and luxury offerings from Kia and Hyundai, for example, which include that feature as standard fare. It is reasonable to conclude that the production-to-consumer costs for including that sliver of metal would be many times the approximately 20 cents saved. It is expected that much of those savings are passed directly to the consumer.
Old 04-09-2007, 01:46 PM
  #17  
Super Member
Thread Starter
 
Pit-Pony's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Canada
Posts: 572
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
2015 C63S E1 (sold 2012 C63 AMG Sedan (Premium & APX)) & 09 C300 Sport 4Matic
Well my dealer looked it up in his shop manual and the C240 4Matic takes 7.5L contrary to the owners manual that had it at 7.0L.

..jack
Old 04-09-2007, 01:49 PM
  #18  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
pmb600's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 2,240
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
E550 4MATIC
Originally Posted by wingless
It is a disingenuous argument to object about the cost for an optional tool, when no objections were voiced about the savings realized from selecting this economy vehicle, instead of the higher quality and luxury offerings from Kia and Hyundai, for example, which include that feature as standard fare. It is reasonable to conclude that the production-to-consumer costs for including that sliver of metal would be many times the approximately 20 cents saved. It is expected that much of those savings are passed directly to the consumer.
I don't think the dipstick was really a cost measure as much as a convience thing. They assumed that owners would prefer to just look at the display on the dash rather than use the dipstick. However, they didn't anticipate that so many people would miss it. That's why 2006+ vehicles have a dipstick once again.
Old 04-10-2007, 11:51 AM
  #19  
Super Member
 
wingless's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Rhode Island
Posts: 911
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Debadged 6-Speed '05 C320 Sports Coupe
Originally Posted by pmb600
I don't think the dipstick was really a cost measure as much as a convience thing. They assumed that owners would prefer to just look at the display on the dash rather than use the dipstick. However, they didn't anticipate that so many people would miss it. That's why 2006+ vehicles have a dipstick once again.
That is an excellent, reasonable explanation. Thank you very much. Wait a minute…

Who suffers, I mean enjoys, greater convenience by the omission of a dipstick?

Does the owner who never checks the oil lever realize greater convenience from a vehicle equipped with a cap instead of a dipstick? Presumably they know that hood thingy opens, but would be hard pressed to actuate it quickly.

Does the owner who always checks the oil level at every fill up benefit? The on-board system prohibits usage if the vehicle is parked and refueled, as the time duration is too short.

Does the owner who purchased a dipstick tool and carries it in the cargo area benefit? The tool must be fully cleaned before storage, including the little crevices around the plastic guides, to ensure the used oil doesn’t stain the interior. The cargo area usage must be carefully controlled to ensure the tool isn’t damaged. The tool must be cleaned prior to usage, to prevent crud from entering the engine.

Does the service shop owner benefit? They must purchase and maintain sufficient tools for each work center. Additionally, they must train and maintain documentation correlating models to tool measurement millimeters. They must also ensure that the tool is located and used properly for each service visit.

This examination found lots of groups who now suffer with greater convenience.
Old 04-21-2007, 11:35 PM
  #20  
Super Member
 
wingless's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Rhode Island
Posts: 911
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Debadged 6-Speed '05 C320 Sports Coupe
There is an undocumented feature on my MY 05 C320 Sports Coupe. There is a hidden storage location for the oil level dipstick tool.

With this tool storage, those who purchased stick-less vehicles now have a superior oil level solution than those with the factory dipstick.

Is the manual wrong about oil capacity?-dipsticktoolstored800x600.jpg

Is the manual wrong about oil capacity?-dipsticktoolhandle800x600.jpg

Is the manual wrong about oil capacity?-dipsticktooltip800x600.jpg
Old 04-22-2007, 02:06 AM
  #21  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Saprissa's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: San Diego, CA & San Jose, Costa Rica & Stuttgart, Germany
Posts: 9,498
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
1959 220S / 1979 230 G / 2002 A210 AMG / 2003 C320 SC / 2004.5 C320 SS / 2005 ML350 SE / 2008 smart
Originally Posted by wingless
There is an undocumented feature on my MY 05 C320 Sports Coupe. There is a hidden storage location for the oil level dipstick tool.

With this tool storage, those who purchased stick-less vehicles now have a superior oil level solution than those with the factory dipstick.
A very nice "undocumented feature" indeed !
Thanks for the pics !

Carlos

Saprissa@aol.com

Sign up: Spring ROSE BOWL Mercedes-Benz Meet / May 12th

Old 04-22-2007, 11:29 AM
  #22  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
pmb600's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 2,240
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
E550 4MATIC
Ok I guess I just don't care that much. I use the computer thing and I would never be bothered with the dipstick.
Old 04-22-2007, 10:10 PM
  #23  
Super Member
 
wingless's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Rhode Island
Posts: 911
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Debadged 6-Speed '05 C320 Sports Coupe
wingless Dipstick Tool Mods

The attached image shows my two mods for the newly-discovered dipstick tool storage location.

There is now a notch to locate the position of the dipstick tip end and to drop this lower into the panel. It was easy to cut this with a utility knife.

A laminated label was attached to the blade, listing the acceptable range, showing the location for that range.

Please feel free to copy these improvements, which are to be called: "the wingless Dipstick Tool Mods".


Is the manual wrong about oil capacity?-winglessdipsticktoolmods800x600.jpg
Old 12-27-2014, 09:26 PM
  #24  
Junior Member
 
krinderhagen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2014
Posts: 22
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
2003 C240
Originally Posted by wingless
There is an undocumented feature on my MY 05 C320 Sports Coupe. There is a hidden storage location for the oil level dipstick tool.

With this tool storage, those who purchased stick-less vehicles now have a superior oil level solution than those with the factory dipstick.





and where do you dipstick i cant find a tube on the engine

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 


You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.

Quick Reply: Is the manual wrong about oil capacity?



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:52 AM.